uTalk

full;8345 wrote:

IyaJJJ;8344 wrote:

If his wallet is not hacked then it's indeed the person that has access to the cryptocurrency wallet information through the email that's responsible for moving the crypto.

Can we say that there's the possibility that GMail has a backdoor operation that give them access to the information and their user email messages

Anything is possible when it come to online activity like this and this is the reason why people are advised never to safe their cryptocurrency wallet private information online.

KingCRP;8221 wrote:

Hey guys I just read a comment where someone was encouraging us to try taking responsibility for our mistakes so I was just wondering what are some of our biggest risk.

One of your biggest risks is saving your seed phrase on an online platform.  An example is iCloud, Gmails, etc. It can be hacked there. You should be able to write it out in a book and keep it safe somewhere.

Camavinga;8308 wrote:

Decentralization remains the best form of banking or keeping your money. Centralized entities have done some much damage over the years and it has be stopped.

Decentralized struture remain the best because its the most secure and fair in every settings.
I dont think there's will be a way to stop the existence of centralization because the government  never wanted it to stop and that's the reason why they sees cryptocurrency as a threat in the first place.

Lanistergame2;6363 wrote:

oba;6330 wrote:

What i am saying is that the US President guarantee the taxpayer they will get back the fund they have with Silicon Valley bank and never make a statement about the non-taxpayer.
In the US tax is mandatory or the IRS will have you arrested especially if you have a house. I believe the student will get their fund either.

Tax fund are probably going into the money being used to repay those that were involved in the loss, so it is only fitting that only tax payers are involved in the repayment.

And about tax being mandatory, it is not really necessary for a society to function and it can be structured better than it is now.

Taxation in general is shit especially here in the united kingdom. It's unnecessarily expensive. As usual the poor gets poorer and the rich continue getting richer.

IyaJJJ;8278 wrote:

Breaking into the encrypted phone of the group that was said to be in charge of multi-ton cocaine shipments that came directly from Colombia, Brazil, and Ecuador to Europe or that traveled through West Africa is painful. People should consider using the utopia for safety.

I supported what you said because the organization doesn't make privacy its top priority despite the fact that they are into an illicit business. Its sad truth that they are naive about privacy.

thrive;8275 wrote:

IyaJJJ;8266 wrote:

The real potential of the PEPE may be known to the general public but you don't understand that it still won't stop some investors from accumulating shady meme coins once influencers hype the coin.

CZ Binance has said it all that the bearish market always exposes the weak coin that only lives on hype and the hype not included in the Utopia cryptocurrency and privacy are the reason why I like and become one of the enthusiasts of the UtopiaP2P project.

What I like about the UtopiaP2P Crypton Coin is that it can't be manipulated and also has no organic price potential which is the reason why it was always resilient in bearish season.

thrive;8269 wrote:

full;8268 wrote:

I dont want to miss this opportunity but will this not affect the price of the Crypton coin in the market? I mean some of the winner selected may choose to sell their CRP coin.

Yes, you have a point but they somehow supported the UtopiaP2P in their own way cause the daily trading capital of Crypton coin will increase.

Honestly, the UtopiaP2P team never seize to surprise me with good things and i respect the enthsuaism they have for the project while they always introduce something that worthwhile for the ecosystem supporters.

IyaJJJ;8264 wrote:

thrive;8262 wrote:

If a single person can cause the dump-in of the price of the PEPE coin then it should be a no go area for all experienced cryptocurrency investors and for the record the Utopia CRP was able to overcome issues that have to do with a price several times.

Apart from that, a cryptocurrency that's launched when the market is in bullish season cant be totally trusted and the project to trust the most is project launch during a bearish and still doing well in the market.

Yes, you have a point. Because some cryptocurrency developer teams use the strategy of the bullish market potential to push their project to the edge and I am sure that after the bullish market is over the real potential of PEPE will be known to the public.

CrytoCynthia;8230 wrote:

KingCRP;8222 wrote:

Ok don’t know if any eine here has been observing what Pepe is doing ? This coin has been significantly amazing but the issue is can It be listed on Utopia p2p?

Yes Pepe has shown some life but I would not bank on Pepe for real it still has to further prove it self to be able to convince me that it is a solid coin.

For now Pepe remains a very solid coin and probably the best Altcoin in the market right now but I am still going to accumulate more crp.

CrytoCynthia;8180 wrote:

oba;8178 wrote:

I believe the Utopia web proxy was created in response to the request made by the original poster of this topic and that's a good one from the utopiaP2P developers.

I believe that Utopia p2p just created this so that they can give their community the much needed freedom to access all sites that they couldn’t.

Either way, the web proxy will provide the Utopia community access to all websites without any form of restriction and it will also provide the Chinese the chance to use avoid their government restrictions without paying any fee.

joanna;8201 wrote:

thrive;8200 wrote:

Smart ass. If you read further you'll know that there is also another flaw which says that "Logging out from Twitter will call all messages including encrypted DMs to be deleted from the current device".

But come to think of it. What's Elon Musk thinking when he create the Twitter encrypted messaging features because this is totally a No No for me and I am not privacy enthusiasts will like the concept used to create the messaging.

I guess he was thinking about attracting more money to the Twitter social media space since he has to make the money invested to purchase the Twitter company and that's he's introducing different features.

IyaJJJ;8190 wrote:

thrive;8189 wrote:

This could be the reason for the encrypted messaging creation because Elon Musk himself once claim the government had access to some private communication of Twitter users under the administration of the previous Chief and I don't see anything stopping now from happening through the Twitter new encrypted messages.

Aside from your prediction about what could be the reason for the Twitter encrypted messages feature. If you read the article I posted it's stated that "Users can only register a maximum of up to 10 devices to send and receive encrypted messages"

Definitely, this proves the impression I had about the concept of Twitter encrypted message communication to be true because you can't trust every centralized platform that offers private communication.
Glad i know the UtopiaP2P.