uTalk

thrive;7766 wrote:

IyaJJJ;7765 wrote:

Some girls are funny though because I don't see the phone a guy is using to be the first impression of going on a date or giving him your number.

To some girls it has to do with what the guy brings to the table and if he brings something that is worthwhile then is not the right person.

Meanwhile people not focusing on something that's really needed is the reason why we see a lot of single moms and divorced men, etc. All because people don't focus on something that matters the most.

Vastextension;7690 wrote:

full;7687 wrote:

One man's food is another poison they say. What you see as your own drawback is the reason why some people choose the Apple phones over any other phones in the market and there's no phone that can compete with Apple phones in the market as we speak.

You have a point because 95% of the people that uses Apple phones use them because of the level of security it provided and the unique feature it had which other mobile phone now imitate.

Yes, some phones imitate the numerous features and advantages of the Apple phone but there's still a price for it which the privacy, and people who don't care much about their privacy will use it without any issue after setting all the right security for their phone.

Vastextension;7581 wrote:

full;7568 wrote:

No, according to what the original poster of this topic said. The duty of the bot is to filter and remove all the unwanted possible scam post in a channel.

Yes, the bot was created to enable required anti-spam filters but I have never seen anyone of the Utopia application client use it before. Does it mean the op quit?

However, we can conclude everything without hearing from the original poster of this topic who I believe is also the creator of the bot and he appears to have been away for a long time. Is there a way to contact him on the UtopiaP2P application client?

thrive;7636 wrote:

full;7635 wrote:

Yes, I am talking about the UtopiaP2P ecosystem and of course, it's already secured but I want you to understand that nothing is secure forever and this is the reason why the developer is doing the route I said.

You have a point and the same daily security route is what some enthusiasts did on the Bitcoin network either because the cryptocurrency scammer and hackers always develop new strategies and equipment and it is important for crypto to always develop simultaneously to maintain quality security.

Guys make me understand what you're trying to say since the UtopiaP2P uses Curve25519, XSalsa20, and Poly1305 algorithms to encrypt, sign, and authenticate packets and connections between users. What is more secure than that?

thrive;7625 wrote:

JONSNOWING;7606 wrote:

Why asking about VPN right now when you can actually assess any site and login any where by just using the Utopia p2p proxy web server.

Yes, the use of VPN, socks, or proxy shouldn't be an issue after UtopiaP2P introduced their web proxy browser which can use to surf all Clearnet websites to avoid restriction and some sort of boundary but if you look at the date this topic was created it was before the launch of the UtopiaP2P web proxy.

We can say that the UtopiaP2P ecosystem developer team create the Utopia Web proxy browser to answer the problem that people from China are experiencing.

thrive;7617 wrote:

Vastextension;7564 wrote:

Yes, things like that make more people to read about cryptocurrency but it's also the reason why project like UtopiaP2P is created although it is a bad thing. Nevertheless, it give rooms for innovative, privacy and security project like Utopia

You have a point. If some cryptocurrency investors are not a victim of crypto scammers people won't look for a solution through a privacy provision project. Yes, it's somehow bad for the market but good for the UtopiaP2P ecosystem.

I agree with you but there are many reason for the creation of the UtopiaP2P ecosystem and it's not only about privacy provision alone. For the record, The UtopiaP2P ecosystem provides a broad range of features, including instant messaging, voice messaging, file transfer, channels to run a blog or news feed, and group chat. Users can also host websites, accept and make payments, and make use of a decentralized domain name system. All these features and those I didn't mention shouldn't be ignored.

oba;7457 wrote:

CrytoCynthia;7453 wrote:

I have to support you on this one, the Anonymity that is available on Utopia p2p is hardly found any where in the cryptocurrency space, I believe this makes Utopia p2p indispensable.

There's no doubt about the UtopiaP2P ecosystem being indispensable but there's always competition in the cryptocurrency market and for the UtopiaP2P to continue as an indispensable project the dev team needs to do some upgrades from time to time.

You're about what said and one of the things I like about the UtopiaP2P developers is that they are working round the clock and always do some system upgrades so the area you mentioned is settled.

KAMSI_UG;7411 wrote:

Hey I was thinking of having the mobile version of the application but I am not too sure, so guys I am a big fan of the uMusic is this service available on the mobile application version.

What i am sure of is that you would get the channel form of the application that’s not a problem but I am not certain you would get the uMusic program it self.

Detroit;7391 wrote:

oba;7336 wrote:

I think the reason why the NFT market is not getting much hype is because of some naive project owner that manipulate the market and as you said it will be a gamble for Utopia to take the step now.

I will strongly disagree with that statement. Possibly you're judging from your geographical location. Here in the UK, NFT is one of the top most profitable online businesses currently.

Ok but I am not judging based on geographical location and I was judging based on the NFT global market. We all know how NFTs were the rave of the moment in the cryptocurrency market until a lot of dev jump into it just to make money.

full;7527 wrote:

level;7526 wrote:

I will make my contribution to this conversation base on how the Utopia developer team has handled the Crypton Exchange from day one and how it is still functioning now. if they could that I think their decision and move won't hurt the project.

I support what you and I have in cryptocurrency for about 5 years now and I have used different decentralized and centralized exchanges. I can say with boldness that I haven't seen any that provide top-notch exchange services like Crypton Exchange.

The reason why I am still one of the holders of CRP and a user of the UtopiaP2P application client is that I believe I am in the right place for privacy, innovation, and the best future profit. Besides, I believe the dev team will always do what is right for the project.

joanna;7333 wrote:

full;7096 wrote:

Meanwhile, we can not exclude these people from the market despite the damage they are doing to the market because they also help the cryptocurrency market get the needed awareness although it is in a bad way but the true potential of crypto will make people see the positive side of it.

You are somehow right no matter how bad the damage the cause to the market there's always something good it will lead to when the people see the truth about the fud they caused.

I think their understanding of the damage would help make good market strategies and produce more profit. Not many people understand the market cap and how it works.