Official forum for Utopia Community
You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
We need a platform where people can share their states, their joys, their sorrows, where they can save their memories, make video calls ...
This kind of social activities tend to define identity.
<p>Share our opinions, gentlemen!</p><p>In my opinion, we need some kind of constructor that will allow even beginners in IT to make sites "on the knee".</p>
What do you mean by "constructor". An Utopia skilled member?
Hi,
a good privacy ecosystem cannot read messages exchanged between two people, even when they are criminals. Also cannot de anonymize users. As a result, criminals can stay hidden and can exchange whatever they want.
Protecting good people also means protecting bad people
But Utopia world can be different from ONION. The so called self regulating society can discourage "public" presence of wrong material. For example by acting on uNS.
Hello, to answer this question, I sincerely think that 99% of people who say "This is bad software, not Open Source" are not even able to read 3 lines of code ...
It's so true...
Anyway, I' think that the skepticism is high not because "I can't read the code to check what it does" but because "No one can read the code, so how can I trust it?".
The same considerations apply to other famous closed-source software, but the large adoption conveys a feeling of security
Pages: 1