Official forum for Utopia Community
You are not logged in.
Many people believe that all cryptocurrency wallets should be open sourced, this may not be the best option despite the current nature of open sources.
Either been the open source or close the most answerable questions there is that is, it offline and how protected it is? It is agreeable that there is always someone behind the wallet.
Offline
Many people believe that all cryptocurrency wallets should be open sourced, this may not be the best option despite the current nature of open sources.
Many people believe much in open source cryptocurrency wallets because the public can view and check the source for any possible abusion but they ignore the fact that such things also come with disadvantages.
Offline
Many people believe much in open source cryptocurrency wallets because the public can view and check the source for any possible abusion but they ignore the fact that such things also come with disadvantages.
There is no disadvantage to being open source. This does not mean that an open source wallet is totally safe to use and you should not take any precautions but open source wallets are much preferable to closed source ones.
Users should be able to see what is going on behind the scenes.
Offline
Vastextension;19579 wrote:Many people believe much in open source cryptocurrency wallets because the public can view and check the source for any possible abusion but they ignore the fact that such things also come with disadvantages.
There is no disadvantage to being open source. This does not mean that an open source wallet is totally safe to use and you should not take any precautions but open source wallets are much preferable to closed source ones.
Users should be able to see what is going on behind the scenes.
An open source wallet always have the reviews and rating of users basically they are open to a large number of people but the close source is limited.
Offline
Open-source is considered good; while closed-source commercial products and services are inherently seen as lesser. In truth, there is often no significant difference between them.
Offline
Open-source is considered good; while closed-source commercial products and services are inherently seen as lesser. In truth, there is often no significant difference between them.
I m trying to assimilate what you 've just said and i can seem to understand, can you kindly help me to elaborate of explain further of your terms in respect to Open source and close source products and services.
Offline
Detroit;19640 wrote:Open-source is considered good; while closed-source commercial products and services are inherently seen as lesser. In truth, there is often no significant difference between them.
I m trying to assimilate what you 've just said and i can seem to understand, can you kindly help me to elaborate of explain further of your terms in respect to Open source and close source products and services.
Well we should understand that Open source are describe as protocol or information or data or product which are made to be accessible to every users while the Close source are information or data access are limited.
Offline
crpuusd;19899 wrote:Detroit;19640 wrote:Open-source is considered good; while closed-source commercial products and services are inherently seen as lesser. In truth, there is often no significant difference between them.
I m trying to assimilate what you 've just said and i can seem to understand, can you kindly help me to elaborate of explain further of your terms in respect to Open source and close source products and services.
Well we should understand that Open source are describe as protocol or information or data or product which are made to be accessible to every users while the Close source are information or data access are limited.
well with the comparison on ground in respect of the utopia ecosystem we should understand that the system is moe likely like a intranet services provider or Ethernet as well. the system provides accessibility uNs hosting for use within the system.
Offline
Europ;20770 wrote:crpuusd;19899 wrote:I m trying to assimilate what you 've just said and i can seem to understand, can you kindly help me to elaborate of explain further of your terms in respect to Open source and close source products and services.
Well we should understand that Open source are describe as protocol or information or data or product which are made to be accessible to every users while the Close source are information or data access are limited.
well with the comparison on ground in respect of the utopia ecosystem we should understand that the system is moe likely like a intranet services provider or Ethernet as well. the system provides accessibility uNs hosting for use within the system.
Of course its always makes more different cause it provides a large amount of server for users within the ecosystem and more over its safe users from the fork of the Centralised governing policy
Offline
Comrade;20782 wrote:Europ;20770 wrote:Well we should understand that Open source are describe as protocol or information or data or product which are made to be accessible to every users while the Close source are information or data access are limited.
well with the comparison on ground in respect of the utopia ecosystem we should understand that the system is moe likely like a intranet services provider or Ethernet as well. the system provides accessibility uNs hosting for use within the system.
Of course its always makes more different cause it provides a large amount of server for users within the ecosystem and more over its safe users from the fork of the Centralised governing policy
The information of users are mostly derived from the centralised platforms and there they are been used for monitoring work flows and activities and files.
Offline
crpuusd;20986 wrote:Comrade;20782 wrote:well with the comparison on ground in respect of the utopia ecosystem we should understand that the system is moe likely like a intranet services provider or Ethernet as well. the system provides accessibility uNs hosting for use within the system.
Of course its always makes more different cause it provides a large amount of server for users within the ecosystem and more over its safe users from the fork of the Centralised governing policy
The information of users are mostly derived from the centralised platforms and there they are been used for monitoring work flows and activities and files.
Its military constitution are all about targeting and investigating people detail,fund and environment, so this actually makes it more reason they are bound to search up peoples bio-data from a Centralised software that actually provides every things that has the name of the person in question on it.
Offline
Comrade;20996 wrote:crpuusd;20986 wrote:Of course its always makes more different cause it provides a large amount of server for users within the ecosystem and more over its safe users from the fork of the Centralised governing policy
The information of users are mostly derived from the centralised platforms and there they are been used for monitoring work flows and activities and files.
Its military constitution are all about targeting and investigating people detail,fund and environment, so this actually makes it more reason they are bound to search up peoples bio-data from a Centralised software that actually provides every things that has the name of the person in question on it.
Your fund mean alot to you, its your hardearn safe guard it and also make aure it always get in increased. The world is all about gettting something.
Offline
The keys are what enable you to access your funds, so it is important that you keep them safe. Don't share them with anyone, and don't store them online fir any reason.
Offline
The keys are what enable you to access your funds, so it is important that you keep them safe. Don't share them with anyone, and don't store them online fir any reason.
The keys are classified as the heart that interact users to the account or wallet and it should be well kept cause whosoever has the key as the code to unlock the account
Offline
PEACEMAKER;25391 wrote:The keys are what enable you to access your funds, so it is important that you keep them safe. Don't share them with anyone, and don't store them online fir any reason.
The keys are classified as the heart that interact users to the account or wallet and it should be well kept cause whosoever has the key as the code to unlock the account
Yeah, Now user should think of leaving the key to other users to have access to their account or wallet.
Offline
crpuusd;26192 wrote:PEACEMAKER;25391 wrote:The keys are what enable you to access your funds, so it is important that you keep them safe. Don't share them with anyone, and don't store them online fir any reason.
The keys are classified as the heart that interact users to the account or wallet and it should be well kept cause whosoever has the key as the code to unlock the account
Yeah, Now user should think of leaving the key to other users to have access to their account or wallet.
That will actually endangered them to unexpected activities within the account and moreover some can get to loose a lot of functions of the account in the process
Offline
Comrade;26200 wrote:crpuusd;26192 wrote:The keys are classified as the heart that interact users to the account or wallet and it should be well kept cause whosoever has the key as the code to unlock the account
Yeah, Now user should think of leaving the key to other users to have access to their account or wallet.
That will actually endangered them to unexpected activities within the account and moreover some can get to loose a lot of functions of the account in the process
Well as it was said guys "prevention is the key to safety resourceful outcome". So if users can endeavors to protect their seedphrase then they can actually be one step closer to safety..
Offline