Official forum for Utopia Community
You are not logged in.
70000 threads i wonder where they come from. I repeat myself whether its true or not the RUMOR circulating right now is that those bots are from hacked accounts. How good it would be a headline like this on some crypto news outlet :
"The UTOPIA ecosystem, the crypto where block validation is done through Amazon hacked server accounts"
Whooo i'm gonna definitely buy that shit. Get a grip on reality, project have sunk for much less
This charade DOES NOT look good. The decentralized p2p project that has 50% of its network running on AWS. Miners Ran by people who doesn't care less for the wellness of the ecosystem. Let's imagine whats happens IF adoption increases, more people use the network, network load increases then for whatever reason those miners go down----->> the network shits the bed because i already saw ripple effects of node overload on my miners.
Those 35000 threads that now accounts for 50% of the network have larger uptime swings than a 13 yrs teenage girl.
But we won't be able to manage or interfere in any way with this work because we would violate the match and plus we don't have access. We can only insist on a fork with a kind of voting system where it will be possible to block these bots among the miners. But so that it was decided democratically without violating the mate.
Very interesting chat in #Utopia-MiningSupport channel. One user warned that Utopia must not share the fate of Bitcoin: today, Bitcoin is mined only by big farms owned by corporations and investment funds. Utopia must remain available for the people, so any regulations that ensure this target are very welcome.
This is not fair to those who are invested in this project to the full. After all, they will have all the functions of maintaining the blockchain. And this is a natural process, not a copy of the Soviet idea of tiering. Who wants opportunities, let them get off the comfortable couch and plow.
In a chat on #Utopia-MiningSupport channel some users complain about fraudulent use of temporary miners to flood the net and blocking minor miners of getting their reward. Maybe it's time to impose more strict regulations on CRP mining, as proposed by some users.
"The result is that all trustable miners will stop mining while the entire network will be driven by scammers", says one user.
One proposal is to block rewards for well-known PK keys.
[later edit] I just find out that no one can block a PK key from getting mining rewards.I would propose to limit the number of miners per PK key (although this would not really solve the problem).
What is your opinion on this? Do you have some ideas to solve this problem?
You can try to make a fork considering all these problems that can cause problems with mining. But it should not be regulated by the developers, otherwise it violates the principles of Utopia.
<p>Grab this uVoucher NOW!<br />I am donating this to the first user who grabs it.<br />UTP-QI56-BW7K-2UXJ-RANT-CLEV<br />This is a way to say "Thank You" to the 1984 group for creating Utopia P2P ecosystem.</p>
Eh, unfortunately, I didn't have time.(
I have an idea, what if in the vouchers could be stitched a certain comment and according to this scheme to collect interesting quests.
Well, I live in Bucharest, and since there is already a channel for Bucharest, I will use it. For other cities, I let the new users in Romania to create the channels for their town.
Try to write news and keep some chats from the whole Romanian community at your place.
How Ethereum is better than an Excel spreadsheet. The main thing from Vitalik Buterin's interview
The creator of the largest-capitalized altcoin on what money should be, why 3 thousand cryptocurrencies is bad, and what a perfect utopia is
The first of two interviews of Ethereum creator Vitalik Buterin with MIT Russian-American professor Lex Friedman was extensively quoted in the English-language segment of the Internet.
In the Russian-language media, this interview was mostly used to single out certain phrases related to the launch of ETH 2.0, the most exciting topic for investors. In this piece, we have compiled snippets of conversation on other topics, focusing primarily on Vitalik's particular understanding of the history, future and meaning of blockchain technology.
- Should there be only one main and leading project among all the many cryptocurrencies over time, or is having more than 3,000 different projects more beneficial to the sector?
A lot is always a good thing, of course. However, perhaps too many people are trying to create and maintain too many new blockchains right now. That's not necessary.
Cryptocurrencies should absolutely be more than one, and more than two and more than five, but not more than 3 thousand. It is also inappropriate to have 30-40 projects that function perfectly from a technical point of view, but do the same thing and bring nothing new.
- Can cryptocurrencies become the world's main currencies?
Fiat money will still remain, it will continue to evolve and digitalize, converging to some extent with cryptocurrencies. The functionality of fiat money is maintained by governments.
However, people will have alternatives that will be useful, such as those whose country's fiat money system does not work well or is in danger of rapid inflation. Cryptocurrencies will also be indispensable if a country is "shut down" from the global financial system, or if there is a global trade crisis. In this case, cryptocurrencies will be a universal, unifying and unbiased way of possible communication between different regions of the planet.
- Centralized control is very limiting. Wouldn't free cryptocurrencies win over centralized technology in such an environment?
Governments prohibit existing corporations from creating their own currencies. Remarkably, if governments allowed large corporations like Google or Twitter to make their own units of calculation, cryptocurrencies would immediately become less appealing to many users.
States have essentially created the conditions necessary for decentralized units of account to emerge and flourish. There are some things that governments have done to the advantage of blockchain, and some things that have done to the disadvantage.
More often than not, governments are in the business of identifying and prosecuting projects with the craziest and most deceptive marketing. It is very likely that in the future many states will use blockchain for their tasks. States do much more than regulate. They are maintaining identity databases, property registries, and ensuring that their currencies and settlement systems function.
- Unsecured money in the physical world. Is this normal?
Money has come a long way. Previously, money was completely secured by gold, then the possibility to exchange money for gold was left to only some people, then money became completely unsecured by anything in the physical world.
In general, the new age is characterized by the fact that a lot of things that are very expensive are not physically represented in any way. For example, Twitter. Its value consists of an idea, software code, and a huge network of users. Even if, for example, all the developers all at once decide to leave such a project, it is not difficult to find new developers who can quickly adapt the project for themselves and continue to work.
- What is remarkable to you about the history of blockchain?
It all comes from the problem of cryptography about Byzantine generals, where several generals besieging a city from different sides must coordinate and not be deceived by traitors. The question is how many generals there must be and how many traitors carrying false information is acceptable to produce a coordinated attack. This problem is solved, but solved only on the condition that initially it is known who the generals are. As technology advances, we see an increase in the number of "generals" who are able to agree among themselves.
In the 80's and 90's, the maximum was a few nodes in the network that could trust each other. In the same way, several different airplane instrument readings can trust each other's credibility. But is it somehow possible to solve this problem without knowing who the generals are - without verifying the identity of the nodes?
The original bitcoin solution was to use some amount of physical resources to limit how many identities a process participant can assign to themselves. Solve a math problem - you get an identity. You solve five problems, you get five identities.
To put it another way, the challenge for blockchain developers is to make multiple nodes on the network be able to work as one computer. It is often said that the first implementation of this idea was bitcoin, using the Proof-of-Work mechanism described above to create a payment system.
In reality, a similar idea was successfully implemented already in the 90s, for protocols aimed at fighting spam emails. In such systems in order to send an email you had to confirm that you spent some amount of energy or to pay for the sending of the email. The system is set up so that it would be very cheap to send emails to friends. However, it would be very expensive to send spam emails to millions of people.
- Tell us about the most impressive ideas of Ethereum?
First and foremost is the idea that money and value can emerge simply from the fact of having a database, if a large number of people trust it. Equally important is the idea of radical interoperability. Two people or two teams can develop decentralized applications that will be open to interacting with each other without both parties having to allow that interaction, or even having to directly exchange some data.
For example, everyone knows about cryptocurrency, which could be bred and crossed with each other, producing new, rarer breeds. Then, quite independently of this project, cryptodinosaurs appeared. To breed them, it was necessary to feed them with cryptocats. The second application came out completely independent of the development team of the first one, just using the results of smart contracts calculations, because the code and results of absolutely all smart contracts are stored on the Ethereum blockchain. It is equally open to every developer.
Development teams don't even have to communicate with each other to make it work. In this way, you can potentially build huge software ecosystems based on each other's available data.
- What's the big question you ask future developers on Ethereum?
Explain what would be the advantage for you of using Ethereum rather than a simple Excel data table.
- What would be an ideal utopia?
An ideal utopia would be a system where the interests of the individual are fully aligned with the interests of society as a whole.
- Would you want immortality?
It depends on what kind. If all the time you could find new tasks with meaning and spend time with friends, I think so. Absolutely!
Original article: https://www.rbc.ru/crypto/news/61fd3eeb9a7947806e639624
<p>Utopia P2P ecosystem is rich in features and has a longstanding history. While there are users in many countries using it, I wonder how can it achieve mass adoption in Romania? The network speed in Romania is very high thanks to the infrastructure, and cryptocurrencies are a common subject in daily talks. Utopia P2P is already available in Romanian language, so this is a BIG advantage. What can be done to raise the awareness in Romania about this top ecosystem?</p>
Hi, could you leave a contact as a public key. To talk to you?
I would also like to be able to translate the interface in the form into your native language. I can offer help to translate the interface into Russian.
In the process of using this forum, I would like to see a semblance of notification as in social networks that I somewhere mentioned, as well as respond to the post.
It's a pity, of course, that it's gambling, not cybersports or thematic games that promote the ideas of Utopia.
О. Just what you need is great. Thank you!
<div class="quotebox"><cite>Gordon;1643 wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><div class="quotebox"><cite>Cromanes;1625 wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>As for me NFT is not a very cool idea stupid marketing, and games rich people as well as marketers for those who have money.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>I do not think that this technology is such a useless, just partly it is still raw and therefore has a lot of unpleasant and critical bugs related to copyrights.</p></div></blockquote></div><br /><p>I agree and maintain that it can open many good possibilities for Utopia.</p>
It just seems to me that someone created this technology, but he realized that this thing is still raw and with the help of the crypto giants very much promoted this thing and everything was bought like hotcakes with promises, but which are not even fulfilled.
I watched this video; if I can take anything from it, it demonstrates how diligent the developers are in setting up the clear_net part of this venture.
The author of the video concludes by saying "after all the information I provided you still want to give your money to someone you do not know, that's you choice - I personally would not" - or along those lines. What money - who gets the money in a truly distributed network?
I watched the video to see any proof of who stays behind Utopia - and I've got "disappointed" as there was no proof or event a hint of exposure - well done the developers!
The author of the video clearly made it to monetize this click-byte in YouTube.
The reality is that there will be many actors coming to Utopia with as many agendas - some will share the world view of the 1984 Group, some (hopefully only few) will not.
I see Utopia as a superbly designed and executed platform with a clear communicated manifesto and parameters - I hope it is adopted by the masses, grows exponentially and lives in eternity.
And the CES question - easy answer - People affected by SEC belong to a different world, WEB 2.0. Utopia is something else.
By the way, on the basis of this hate on the part of that channel as well as the apparently not entirely technical knowledgeable channel. It will be possible to write a promotional concept that can convince even the most inveterate in doubts person.
<div class="quotebox"><cite>Cromanes;1317 wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p><div class="quotebox"><cite>Posi;1258 wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>Yeah its a good question, i&#039;m waiting impacient a good answer</p></div></blockquote></div><p>I found an opinion among the Russian community about those behind Utopia. And if you want if you want I can translate, yes the author says that it is an assumption, if you are interested, I can translate for you in English to study.</p><p>Here&#039;s a link to the video: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-h8Kt58t7io&amp;ab_channel=Pulse" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-h8Kt58 … nnel=Pulse</a></p></p></div></blockquote></div><p>I watched this video; if I can take anything from it, it demonstrates how diligent the developers are in setting up the clear_net part of this venture. </p><p>The author of the video concludes by saying "after all the information I provided you still want to give your money to someone you do not know, that's you choice - I personally would not" - or along those lines. What money - who gets the money in a truly distributed network? </p><p>I watched the video to see any proof of who stays behind Utopia - and I've got "disappointed" as there was no proof or event a hint of exposure - well done the developers!</p><p>The author of the video clearly made it to monetize this click-byte in YouTube.</p><p>The reality is that there will be many actors coming to Utopia with as many agendas - some will share the world view of the 1984 Group, some (hopefully only few) will not.</p><p>I see Utopia as a superbly designed and executed platform with a clear communicated manifesto and parameters - I hope it is adopted by the masses, grows exponentially and lives in eternity. </p><p>And the CES question - easy answer - People affected by SEC belong to a different world, WEB 2.0. <strong>Utopia is something else</strong>.</p>
Hi. Do you understand Russian? Interesting. However, why not answer me this post in Russian?)
basically what I wanted to say is that the airdrop is a very good hook to attract new users, so I think it would be a great idea to have one in Spanish.
As a representative of the Russian community I will say that there is its own complicated specifics, but if you want to conduct an Aidrop you can contact me about this, and perhaps it is you with our help will be able to conduct. Write in messenger Telegram.
Here are my contacts: @motus_persona
Honestly, most people don't hate so much anymore and they agree that there was more order and less crime.
Why? I heard that he would raise the country economically, it would probably be Chilli's Singapore.
Today the Romanian Police made public it's decision to buy cripto-mining detection software in order to discover suspicious activities on the net. Is Utopia "detection-resistant" to such software?
Hahahahaha. By the way, it would be very interesting to test this. I know that the code is closed and there are problems that will still require proof.
I think it's a very good idea, especially because of what you say about the return of the investment if the game does not prosper, with that the users will be more willing to invest.
As I remember a similar thing was offered some time back in the 17s by ethereum. What I really liked about it at the time.
<p>I own a small printing and graphic design store, I could give them to my clients as a gift or maybe as a discount card on some products.</p>
But you can, for coin liquidity, accept payment in the form of CRP using this roadmap already suggested above.
I own a small printing and graphic design store, I could give them to my clients as a gift or maybe as a discount card on some products.
Hmm. Is there any way we can get in touch with you. There's something we need to discuss.
Even if mining won't be a choice in Android, the adoption of Utopia will skyrocket upon the release of Utopia P2P Client app for Android, which is very good. This will attract many new users to the ecosystem, thus making it stronger in all ways.
It would be interesting if the developers of Utopia would develop an OS with more and advanced features.
<div class="quotebox"><cite>Gordon;1644 wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><div class="quotebox"><cite>Nelagorn;1615 wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>Will mining be possible with android? in a high-end phone I imagine, but will they develop it?</p></div></blockquote></div><p>I guess not with these technologies.</p></div></blockquote></div><br /><p>Well, we will have to wait for the change in technology, I remember all the things that seemed impossible on Symbian and are now everyday on Android.</p>
In the meantime, we have to get past the semiconductor supply crisis at this point in time.
For these last 2 posts I think there was a definite answer, but it disappeared somewhere?
Agree. The launching of Android version will bring many new users to the ecosystem, thus empowering Utopia and all the services it provides.
Well I think because of some restrictions almost all the possibilities.