uTalk

Posi;1345 wrote:

<div class="quotebox"><cite>Cromanes;1326 wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><div class="quotebox"><cite>Makedonskiy;1081 wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>&lt;p&gt;I am personally against the opening of sources. I don&amp;#039;t need network forks. You can understand the developers: the software is unique, a lot of effort has been spent, and it is unwise to give it to everyone.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It is curious, but a fact: only 1-2 out of 100,000 users can conduct a real audit of the source code. Open source applications are being hacked much more often.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thus, open sources become just a tick in marketing.&lt;/p&gt;</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Yes, in part, it does not guarantee the security of the code itself. But it removes the developers&#039; responsibility for hiding a potential backdoor in an application that will collect data about you by default. And as for me this product&#039;s theme as anonymity of actions in the network should imply open source code as for self-study of what potential risks there could be and what responsibility the user can bear himself, instead of shifting the blame to those who developed it. And until a certain solution to open source is applied, the messenger &quot;Utopia&quot; will continue to be called, &quot;The Business of Anonymity&quot;.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>I agree with what you said in the sense that open source generates trust within the Dev team, user, and the community. However, it will lead to the vulnerability of the platform but the platform will easily gain more user.</p><p>I believe there&#039;s alot of important reason why the Utopia make the source code to e close source.  </p>

It would be interesting to know which ones?

Posi;1255 wrote:

Meanwhile there's still chance to make use of the Utopia app on linux mobile phone or use windows emulator on android phone that has 4Gb plus ram.

It also depends on the first seconds of installation. And as I know there need phones with special processors for more or less stable operation of the network need to use those phones where the operating system "Windows Phone".

Makedonskiy;1081 wrote:

<p>I am personally against the opening of sources. I don&#039;t need network forks. You can understand the developers: the software is unique, a lot of effort has been spent, and it is unwise to give it to everyone.</p><p>It is curious, but a fact: only 1-2 out of 100,000 users can conduct a real audit of the source code. Open source applications are being hacked much more often.</p><p>Thus, open sources become just a tick in marketing.</p>

Yes, in part, it does not guarantee the security of the code itself. But it removes the developers' responsibility for hiding a potential backdoor in an application that will collect data about you by default. And as for me this product's theme as anonymity of actions in the network should imply open source code as for self-study of what potential risks there could be and what responsibility the user can bear himself, instead of shifting the blame to those who developed it. And until a certain solution to open source is applied, the messenger "Utopia" will continue to be called, "The Business of Anonymity".

vmware helps you

Honestly, I want to see a welcome demand to buy cryptocurrency and its liquidity as it is currently dropping lower again from $1. And I also want to see activity in the Utopia ecosystem by audiences of people from autocratic countries and where uprisings are experienced with this.

Posi;1307 wrote:

This is the first time I will hear about Utopia Pay and merely looking at it, it's an incredible idea but with Crypton exchange haven't added pairs for top coins like BTC which the crypto used mostly for crypto payment around the world. Is it possible to reach BTC, CRP, USDT, ETH payment using Utopia Pay?

As for me "Utopia pay" is a good development, but useless at this time of development and need to attract the movement and liquidity of cryptocurrency CRP and steilbkoin UUSD. In exchange markets, and then gradually promote it, as I think.

If you look at the side of "Utopia" then partly it will also contain some crumbs of information about you

and there will be a technical solution such as discentarization

with mobille app utopia can become more popular

Good evening everyone!    As I understand it, right now it is not possible to transfer ownership (admin rights) of the channel to another person.

Suppose I want to sell the channel in the future, would it be possible to do so? Or do I need to create a separate account for each channel?