Official forum for Utopia Community
You are not logged in.
Lanistergame2;7226 wrote:oba;7112 wrote:...However, this is not the case with cryptocurrency because scammers are everywhere and the only thing every crypto enthusiast must have in common is good knowledge of how to play safe and never be a victim of scams in any form.
You are right. Good knowledge of how to browse the internet is essential for anyone who is into crypto. Scammers are lurking everywhere waiting for a little slip up to steal your funds or your privacy.
Always stay vigilant and view anything as a scam.Knowledge of how to browse the internet is not what is needed because browsing the internet is something easy. What is needed is how to safely use the internet and also avoid human mistake.
Hey mate, I think I will disagree with you there. Browsing through the internet is not easy at all. You have to be very careful because there are a lot of scammers on the internet.
full;7096 wrote:joanna;7060 wrote:Hmm. Oh my Gosh. It's true.There's a lot of article writers that are doing so much damage to the market than helping the market because they are never enthusiast of the cryptocurrency and blockchain technology.
Meanwhile, we can not exclude these people from the market despite the damage they are doing to the market because they also help the cryptocurrency market get the needed awareness although it is in a bad way but the true potential of crypto will make people see the positive side of it.
You are somehow right no matter how bad the damage the cause to the market there's always something good it will lead to when the people see the truth about the fud they caused.
I think their understanding of the damage would help make good market strategies and produce more profit. Not many people understand the market cap and how it works.
thrive;7202 wrote:Technically those that invested in Dogecoin when Elon Musk hype it through Twitter are at loss. There's no one to blame but their naivety about cryptocurrency investment.
Not everyone. There would always be those who were quick enough to make a purchase in anticipation of the spike in the peice after the news announcement and sold off as the price was rising.
For there to be people that made a loss while investing there has to be those that dumped on them who made a profit
Yeah, some folks have the mentality of selling off immediately there is hype or an increase in the price of a commodity. This can be a good thing to some extent but can also be bad. I usually tell people if you withdraw your Bitcoin when it was 50 or 100 dollars you still made a profit and should not be mad at yourself for not leaving it to get to 50k dollars.
Detroit;7220 wrote:Lanistergame2;7215 wrote:That is an extreme measure if you ask me. It is a bad practice to be covert about if your source code is open source or not and I would advice people to look for open source alternatives to it, but that does not call for a shutdown.
A regulatory body for a decentralized industry contradicts why the industry exists at all. Regulations are not a solution to problems but a way for governments to gain control.
It doesn't have to be people to do it. They can find away to incorporate it into the blockchain system. Many people do not know the difference between closed-source or open sources or scam projects.
When we say many people dont know the different between close source and scam project this is only applicable to the newbies who enter the market just to make profit. However, regulation is not the solution.
What do you think is the problem? Mind you I didn't say it was the problem but it is the solution for a safer cryptic urgency environment. Teaching users how to detect scam projects would be also beneficial.
Utopia is wonderful decentralized ecosystem, centralization has taken over the world today, people do not worry about their privacy and anonymity anymore, but utopia is a great way to escape from centralization. For people who value their privacy and anonymity, they should move to the utopia ecosystem.
Yeah, mate, utopia is indeed wonderful. Utopia has really helped a lot of cryptocurrency users to break down into simple units what anonymity means and how it is achievable.
Lanistergame2;7221 wrote:KingCRP;7177 wrote:The NFT market place isn’t a flourish sector as it once was so I would not also pay so much attention on it, Let’s all relax and watch how Utopia p2p keeps dropping more Utilities.
While the NFT market is not in the hype season at this time, a real product with real utility would be able to flourish and get the attention of the public.
It would be a gamble for the Utopia team and it might be better to wait for a more conducive time to launch such a project, but I am sure it would be successful tither ways.
I think the reason why the NFT market is not getting much hype is because of some naive project owner that manipulate the market and as you said it will be a gamble for Utopia to take the step now.
I will strongly disagree with that statement. Possibly you're judging from your geographical location. Here in the UK, NFT is one of the top most profitable online businesses currently.
IyaJJJ;7301 wrote:Kelechi;7287 wrote:Yes mate anything that is hosted on Utopiap2p definitely would have such utilities for it's enjoyment that's why it's a smart decision to actually do so .
The smart decision aspect of host a website on the UtopiaP2P network is that the website will be a means to avoid restriction, sanction, manipulation by the government and the website will be eternal.
One of the advantages of hosting a website on Utopia is that the website will be available within Utopia, gaining access to millions of like-minded Utopia users while keeping the real hosting location hidden, preserving their secrecy.
What kind of website do they host? Hosting a website is a bit more technical than what utopia is preventing it to be. So does utopia also own the domain of your website?
Well the last time such a thing was hosted the price was about 500 CRP I think if the team can do it then they should be able to do it now so no problem about that.
Yeah, I agree with you. The team should be able to host this competition without stress currently. They have the capacity and ability to do it now.
Detroit;7210 wrote:Such platforms should be shutdown. I have actually imagined cryptocurrency having such a body where they regulate and dictate misleading projects and shut them down.
That is an extreme measure if you ask me. It is a bad practice to be covert about if your source code is open source or not and I would advice people to look for open source alternatives to it, but that does not call for a shutdown.
A regulatory body for a decentralized industry contradicts why the industry exists at all. Regulations are not a solution to problems but a way for governments to gain control.
It doesn't have to be people to do it. They can find away to incorporate it into the blockchain system. Many people do not know the difference between closed-source or open sources or scam projects.
Kelechi;7118 wrote:Camavinga;6636 wrote:Yeah mate, they are very good people, i have worked with a couple of Russians on the internet and i have not had any problem working with them. I think it is their government that is giving them a bad name, but people should not take all of them to be bad people.
Well we aren't in any place to determine the status of the Russian government but what we can say is that war is doing more harm than good to everyone. I hope to have more deals with Russians because they are honest.
Well we all have our experience with people and I don’t think we should judge the character people by what is being said about their countries. I hope we can get a local board truely.
Yeah, local boards are inevitable, they will surely come. It is just that it will take some time but it will definitely come. Probably be before the year runs out.
full;7081 wrote:Don't get the user wrong. He may not have a deep understanding of the CryptonBet channel but I think such complain he made will make the owner do some important upgrades and I am sure the owner of the channel will think of creating a website with the name CryptonBet since he has bought a uNS for it.
Creating and running a betting website is a commitment that anyone getting into has to be fully ready for. Creating a channel and purchasing a uNS are just scratching the surface of what it entails.
I would advice anyone considering that to consider all loose ends and tighten them before making such commitments.
Good points, I agree with you. Do you mind listing out those loose ends that needs tightening up? I'm sure many do not know or understand what you mean by that.
level;5782 wrote:Detroit;5690 wrote:I'm really interested to know how that is possible. Can please share a link or tell use how it is done? I'm sure many people will be glad to see how the Uvoucher works and how it can also be generated by one on their own in thier homes.
To activate a uVoucher click uWallet "Diamond logo" at the menu bar. Select "uVoucher". Click the "create new uVoucher box and enter the value of the CRP coin you want the uVoucher to contain and create the uVoucher.
Good explanation but in case we may be some people who are newbies in the forum I will attach an image that explained the process of creating a uVoucher. I could remember the hell I went through when I want to create my first uVoucher.
https://i.imgur.com/JcOOm4k.png
https://i.imgur.com/Jy9cSR2.png
Wow, thanks for this mate. I'm going to try it out. It was not that complicated after all. I want to use this period to say happy holiday to you and your family.
KAMSI_UG;7000 wrote:Writers I have a suggestion, I am not in support of a writers board here because it’s far off the topic meant to be discussed here but if the reading and writing is crypto related then it’s ok.
Well what ever it is I believe that if a writers board should be created then I believe it should be placed in the off topic section for those interested in it.
Yeah, good point. I was also thinking when this board is created we can start a writer's competition where writers come out to bless us with their creative writings and the best writer wins.
Kelechi;7117 wrote:Well I think it's the end of the road for Cristino Ronaldo in terms of the UEFA champions league and I think Messi has little time left on his as well.
Messi has little time, how? I ask this question because from what I see Messi has a lot of time. Besides, he can still play for 20 more years.
That's impossible mate. Can't you see his recent matches? The man has declined in so many ways in football. He needs to rest and take care of his family. The highest I can see him stay is the next ten years which he is most likely not playing in the next world cup.
IyaJJJ;7186 wrote:oba;7103 wrote:Let's get this straight, the true intention of the developer team is to provide an ecosystem that will ease the burden of cryptocurrency enthusiasts and also provide a form of security in terms of privacy and investment. Therefore, I don't see any reason why they will choose not to add more pairs on the Crypton Exchange if there's no tangible reason.
All I can say is that the developer team understands what we want and if they didn't understand they won't have created a topic on this forum dedicated to the community voting for the next pairs they will add to the Crypton Exchange but if they are not adding it now then there must be a good reason for it.
I believe no sensible person will read what you guys said here and won't agree with you. However, we still have a lot of people that won't understand this or read what you just said.
In the meantime, I have a strong feeling that they will add more pairs before the end of this year.
I agree with you mate. It seems so. It does seems like temporary something they will solve in no time. We all just have to be patient with them.
KAMSI_UG;7146 wrote:Not only that mate if we organize it ourselves then the transparency of the competition can’t be assured, also I don’t think it would go down well with the team that we are organizing such programs ourselves.
About transparency, if there is any reputable member willing to act as an escrow it can make the process safer and transparent, I am not sure there is such a person other users can trust their funds with.
I personally do not think the team would mind at all. It brings publicity to the forum and sparks off a new trend of discussion. A win win if you ask me.
I personally will say that is expecting too much from one person. Giving such an amount to someone to hold is not a really good idea. I think it's best the developers do it themselves.
Detroit;6829 wrote:Camavinga;6804 wrote:I don’t really get your point, an open source project is one that is open for everyone and anyone to verify the codes that the developers used, while in a closed source project you cannot verify the codes by yourself, this is the reason more people like open source projects more.
What I am trying to say is that some projects may claim to be open source and at the end of the day you realized that they are hiding something which makes it a scam.
Trust Wallet is an example of what you said here. They claimed to be open source but their source code is not available for the public to review and that's the reason you'll never see long-term and genuine cryptocurrency enthusiasts that trust the wallet.
Such platforms should be shutdown. I have actually imagined cryptocurrency having such a body where they regulate and dictate misleading projects and shut them down.
Camavinga;6937 wrote:IyaJJJ;6827 wrote:You seem to know a lot about the UtopiaP2P project and from what I see either a lot of users are requesting so much from the dev team. However, all this happened because they have high enthusiasm for the project.
You have a very good point and i think people should understand that too, people are not asking things of the developers because they have not done well or because the project is not good, but because there is so much enthusiasm about what the project has already achieved and users cannot wait for more to experience.
You got the point and when people have huge enthusiasm for something they intent to want more from it. However, the enthusiasts of the UtopiaP2P project need to play cool with their requests from the developers.
I believe the developers should be able to deliver that. That is one if the reason they are out there. Thar includes serving humanity and getting paid for it in return.
oba;7108 wrote:level;7085 wrote:An enormous number of altcoins may be the reason why Crypton was not noticed but that's not the actual reason. The reason is that most cryptocurrency investors are always after profit, and hype and only a few consider using privacy coins.
Well said, a lot of cryptocurrency enthusiasts focus only on the hype-based projects and projects mentioned by people like Elon Musk, etc. This is the reason why Doge experience an uptrend when Elon Musk added its logo to Twitter but go a downtrend when whales dump $151 million worth of the coin.
The same thing happened when we see people who are victims of the scam DeFi but the change is coming soon.Technically those that invested in Dogecoin when Elon Musk hype it through Twitter are at loss. There's no one to blame but their naivety about cryptocurrency investment.
Meanwhile, I am happy to have vast knowledge about crypto, or else I will also be among those chasing the wrong investments when I can get everything I ever wanted through CRP coin.
Would you really use the word "naivety"? These individuals invested in dogecoin because the richest man in the world endorsed it. People put aside their disbelief for years about cryptocurrency and want to do something for themselves, and those scammers saw it as away to cash out then portraying cryptocurrency as a scam package.
CrytoCynthia;7124 wrote:Kelechi;7117 wrote:Well I think it's the end of the road for Cristino Ronaldo in terms of the UEFA champions league and I think Messi has little time left on his as well.
I hope the Uefa Champions league can create or get another player or players that can be as half as influential as Cristiano Ronaldo and Leonel Messi.
We are seeing how Erling Haaland is breaking every goal scoring record available now. I think the future is bright you can also see player like Victor osimehn and others.
Yeah, the future is indeed very bright. Many young stars are ready to show us their potential. You forgot to mention mbape, the dude is brilliant.
Camavinga;7075 wrote:Detroit;6987 wrote:I agree with you. But I think the people are the reason for business. Without human traffic there is no business and when there is no business no money. Serving and getting customers should be their number one priority.
You are very correct, but i think maybe there is a real and genuine reason why Utopia cannot add extra trading pairs for now, but since we are not working closely with the team we do not know, i believe in the future there will be more volume in the exchange, but for now people have to use it for the other wonderful features it offers.
Let's get this straight, the true intention of the developer team is to provide an ecosystem that will ease the burden of cryptocurrency enthusiasts and also provide a form of security in terms of privacy and investment. Therefore, I don't see any reason why they will choose not to add more pairs on the Crypton Exchange if there's no tangible reason.
As much as I get your point there must be a valid reason fur them to do that. Also if there's no valid reason, they must really lack business sense.
joanna;7049 wrote:Let's accept they do not want to run the contest but it's something we can also at least organize among us and if that it's not possible it's better to forget it for now.
We cannot organize it ourselves, if the forum members organize it, where is the prize for the winner going to come from, except one user is going to donate it. If you think you can pool funds together for it, it would also not work because you cannot trust whoever is going to hold the funds for the winner, that’s why we should wait for the admin.
That's a good point. I agre with you. No project can work here properly without the authorization of the administrators of this forum. They need to be aware and also show us their support.
Detroit;6984 wrote:I hope they keep getting better they don't relent.
I don't see the dev team relenting now buddy and I believe for the community and investors to be sure of their dedication to this project is the reason why they make it a self-funded project.
I never said they have relented. I said I hope they do not relent in their good work. Because the moment they start mismanagement this project, the whole utopia community will just crumble.
joanna;7060 wrote:full;7059 wrote:I believe you missing the point because the message was about some bloggers and article writers whose purpose was always to write something especially negative news that will make them get traffic.
Hmm. Oh my Gosh. It's true.There's a lot of article writers that are doing so much damage to the market than helping the market because they are never enthusiast of the cryptocurrency and blockchain technology.
Meanwhile, we can not exclude these people from the market despite the damage they are doing to the market because they also help the cryptocurrency market get the needed awareness although it is in a bad way but the true potential of crypto will make people see the positive side of it.
Well, fair enough. They are doing publicity for cryptocurrency but they are causing more harm to cryptocurrency and the users. Because of the constant link to scams users can't freely request for someone to use btc as a payment option without being looked at as a scam potential.
Detroit;6965 wrote:Lanistergame2;6953 wrote:If a project is fully open source, then every code used is verifiable, they would only be able to hide something if you do not know how to check or what to do on their github. With closed source you can not verify anything cause it is all hidden.
There is a slight risk of a dev slipping a backdoor in with an ope source project, but that is a very slim possibility.
Okay, thanks for fit highlighting that out. I will also like to know how to cross check or verify if a unit or platform is an open or closed source. Is it something for the computer nerds or fit everyone?
There are two methods for testing or verifying open-source code. The first method is to compare checksums, while the second, more robust method is to use PGP.
In other words. The process is detecting variations between a smart contract's source code and the compiled bytecode utilized during contract generation.
What are checksums and bytecode? Are these visible to everybody?
Also, what is PGP? Those variations are supposed to be regular to confirm it is an open source?