Official forum for Utopia Community
You are not logged in.
joanna;8093 wrote:Camavinga;8007 wrote:Community engagement and community participation are tools businessmen and women use to fast-forward their businesses to the next level. I think the developers for the Utopia community are lacking it.
I would have agreed with what you're saying if there are no moderators on the Utopia P2P application client but you need to know that the developers of Utopia need to secure the privacy either since.
Both of you have some point cause the UtopiaP2P developer participation and communication with the community will somehow impact the trust of some users of the ecosystem into having more enthusiasm for the project. However, I don't see that affecting their privacy.
I think they are somehow on the same side because they are saying something that will push the UtopiaP2P project forward but the developers of the ecosystem have already engaged in community engagement and community participation.
CrytoCynthia;7739 wrote:Napoli are officially the seria A champions after Victor osimehen scored the equalizer in their last match, it was a big celebration in the stadium as they haven’t won the league for more than 30yrs.
I dont have the chance to watch the match but based on Victor Osimehen's performance in Serie A this season he ought to give an award in the tournament and I could remember how the fans of his club were chanting his name the last time I watch their match.
I am not a fan of the Seria A games but I have heard a lot of things about Victor Osimehen's and how he came out of being an underrated play to be his current club leading player.
IyaJJJ;7530 wrote:joanna;7528 wrote:The reason why I am still one of the holders of CRP and a user of the UtopiaP2P application client is that I believe I am in the right place for privacy, innovation, and the best future profit. Besides, I believe the dev team will always do what is right for the project.
I believe in other for the UtopiaP2P developer team not to ruin the adoption and traffic of the project while it only increase is the reason why they did the project review on BTT.
The developers seem to be a wide set of people. I don't think they will mess it up. They are very coordinated and also they listen to their users. This help them to narrow their decisions and determine their next line of action.
Yes, they cant mess this up but it's hard to know how wide or huge is the developer teams.
oba;7725 wrote:Vastextension;7581 wrote:Yes, the bot was created to enable required anti-spam filters but I have never seen anyone of the Utopia application client use it before. Does it mean the op quit?
Although, I don't have the tech knowledge about how bot are created but i believe the user spent his valuable time creating the bot and I don't expect him either to just quit like that not minding the time he spent developing the bot.
Time spent on creating a bot depends on the advanced knowledge and skills of the creator with the inclusion of the functionality the bot will provide. I think the user is enthusiastic about this project and I don't expect him to give up on something easily.
In some case the time spent on anything either a bot or something that has to do with offline have to do with the creator's level of knowledge there are some people that can handle the hard task and execute it in no time.
The level the threat actors are operating lately is crazy and i wonder how they will easily change legitimate banking transfers made by the victims by changing the beneficiary and transferring money to an unauthorized bank account they create the launder victim fund.
Kelechi;7604 wrote:USDC was depegged due to their crisis with silicon valley bank, I definitely fear for stable coin but I have confidence in UUSD.
That may be the situation but USDC was de-pegged because it wasn't fundamentally strong and I think it's the time inexperienced developer team learned from the UtopiaP2P developer.
I think it's time that all the stablecoin project developers learn from the mistake made by the USDC because the mistake was just like the TerraUSD mistake.
I am glad to have learn about the Utopia project before now.
KAMSI_UG;7820 wrote:IyaJJJ;7819 wrote:I guess you dont understand that ChatGPT is still new and the impact of will continue to grow in many different sectors of the economy, as there will be many upgrade.
I wouldn’t say ChatGPT is new, it’s fast becoming an advancing technology and it has already started to displace many jobs in every industry now.
Ok. Assuming i agree with you that ChatGPT is not new. When was is it launch?
Normally, most project creator start from the basic before they move to the advanced stage of it and that's one of the reason why i said ChatGPT is still new.
You have a point it's always one step after another and I could remember when I first join the UtopiaP2P project the application client is not as good as the current one we're using now and in the future, the application will be better.
CrytoCynthia;7783 wrote:Camavinga;7782 wrote:How can ChatGTP offer privacy?? You can't offer what you don't have. This a bot that takes information from you in other to serve you well. So if they take that information from you, how safe are they???
ChatGPT is a more like a chat tool and I don’t think it has its own privacy protection but since it’s under Utopia p2p then it’s very much protected.
Well what I feel was the question was that how secured is the Utopia p2p ChatGPT, I have seen many ChatGPT that are just like a virus and can actually cause damage to the user.
Very secure because everything integrated on the UtopiaP2P network is eternal, secure storage with 256-bit AES and curve25519 high-speed encryption.
IyaJJJ;7768 wrote:oba;7767 wrote:Meanwhile people not focusing on something that's really needed is the reason why we see a lot of single moms and divorced men, etc. All because people don't focus on something that matters the most.
Yes, and it is sad because divorced marriage somehow impacts the life of the children. The children ought to have their father's and mother's love while growing up to make something positive for the environment and the community where he/she was raised.
It does impact our society because we have seen some kids who ought to be in high school that are into drugs and all bad activities that are affecting our society negatively.
Honestly is it a sad experience and I think our jury and relationship therapist have a lot of job to do in the couple or marriage aspect to work on something that will prevent further divorce marriage.
IyaJJJ;7765 wrote:oba;7764 wrote:You are totally connected buddy. This is mainly common in the US. If you're not using the iPhone girls believe you're a punk ass person that didn't match their standards.
Some girls are funny though because I don't see the phone a guy is using to be the first impression of going on a date or giving him your number.
To some girls it has to do with what the guy brings to the table and if he brings something that is worthwhile then is not the right person.
Meanwhile people not focusing on something that's really needed is the reason why we see a lot of single moms and divorced men, etc. All because people don't focus on something that matters the most.
IyaJJJ;7762 wrote:oba;7733 wrote:Yes, some phones imitate the numerous features and advantages of the Apple phone but there's still a price for it which the privacy, and people who don't care much about their privacy will use it without any issue after setting all the right security for their phone.
There is no doubt about iPhones having great features and benefit in terms of functionalities but I never like their phone for a personal reason until the news broke out that there's Bitcoin code on the Mac computer.
This is normal cause every like something for different reasons. Speaking of the reason why some people like the iPhone, some people like it just to showcase themselves as a big boy in front of girls because some girls don't like any guy that's not using the iPhone.
This may look funny but it's the truth.
You are totally connected buddy. This is mainly common in the US. If you're not using the iPhone girls believe you're a punk ass person that didn't match their standards.
full;7676 wrote:thrive;7617 wrote:You have a point. If some cryptocurrency investors are not a victim of crypto scammers people won't look for a solution through a privacy provision project. Yes, it's somehow bad for the market but good for the UtopiaP2P ecosystem.
Normally all cryptocurrency investors ought to adopt the use of privacy and security service to keep their investments secure from prying eyes and online scammers but investor's ignorance to this is the reason why we see people who are victims of crypto hacks.
A naive person is dangerous to themselves and the people around and they mostly dug their own grave not knowing whereas their belief is that they are doing the right thing. It is good for every cryptocurrency investment to know the "doS" and "dontS" in the crypto market.
The only way anyone would know this is through the habit of seeking more knowledge about how to safely invest and hold cryptocurrency for the long term.
full;7687 wrote:joanna;7683 wrote:Privacy consider is one of the reasons why I never use Apple phones as my hot phone. Yes, the features and the functionality of the phone are good and it's indeed top-notch the privacy level of it is a no for me.
One man's food is another poison they say. What you see as your own drawback is the reason why some people choose the Apple phones over any other phones in the market and there's no phone that can compete with Apple phones in the market as we speak.
You have a point because 95% of the people that uses Apple phones use them because of the level of security it provided and the unique feature it had which other mobile phone now imitate.
Yes, some phones imitate the numerous features and advantages of the Apple phone but there's still a price for it which the privacy, and people who don't care much about their privacy will use it without any issue after setting all the right security for their phone.
IyaJJJ;7621 wrote:thrive;7620 wrote:A club like Brighton and Hove Albion is one of the major threats to big football club teams in the Premier League game but I believe Manchester City wont to have the experience they had in the FA Cup
That's true. I believe you wanted to say Manchester United here, if so. Yes, they have an encounter with Brighton and Hove Albion at the FA Cup Semi-final which was a hot sit for Manchester United and all their fans.
Yes, I did remember the FA Cup semi-final that was played last month. I bet on the game and my hope is that I lost the bet until Manchester United defeated Brighton and Hove Albion by penalty.
Honestly, if Brighton and Hove Albion could make a good purchase of players when the transfer market is opened, I consider them to be among one of the best and most dangerous in the next season.
thrive;7630 wrote:Dozie;7522 wrote:Well one of the best ways to do that should have been here, that's why I keep asking when would the team be more active on this forum?
When would the team be more active on this forum? Who tells you they are not active on this forum? Do you think they are not working behind the scheme?
I think he doesn't understand all the questions you're asking and his belief is that the UtopiaP2P team is only active on this forum when they post a message or make a direct contribution.
Since all the technical aspect of this forum is well managed then the developer team are active on this forum and they just choose not to be physically active because Utopia need to maintain its decentralization and when it is time for them to be physically active they will be.
level;7728 wrote:IyaJJJ;7638 wrote:Additionally, Utopia Network uses a dynamic multi-link routing engine with MITM (man-in-the-middle) attack protection, so all user communication is shielded from being intercepted and read by outside parties.
Yes, the UtopiaP2P network is designed with security and privacy as its top priorities. However, the ecosystem still needs validators who act as intermediaries in transmitting data from one user to another, ensuring that all communication is encrypted using advanced algorithms. I believe this is what the users are trying to point out.
Yes, that's the exact thing the users are trying to say because the duty of UtopiaP2P network validators which are also known as server nodes, is maintaining the security and privacy of the network.
They are also the ones who authenticate and confirm transactions and blocks on the UtopiaP2P network, establishing consensus and preventing duplicate spending, which is why some people refer to them as miners.
Is Lbank a decentralized exchange? Also do they also have trading options? I am thinking of actually using the Lbank exchange soon.
Yes, LBank has vast trading options but it's never a decentralized exchange, and if you want more information about the exchange I will advise you to check the exchange on CoinMarketCap.
full;7568 wrote:Detroit;7478 wrote:What exactly does the bot do on the utopia network? I saw some thing like protection, does it also help to dictate scammers on the utopia network?
No, according to what the original poster of this topic said. The duty of the bot is to filter and remove all the unwanted possible scam post in a channel.
Yes, the bot was created to enable required anti-spam filters but I have never seen anyone of the Utopia application client use it before. Does it mean the op quit?
Although, I don't have the tech knowledge about how bot are created but i believe the user spent his valuable time creating the bot and I don't expect him either to just quit like that not minding the time he spent developing the bot.
joanna;7648 wrote:thrive;7629 wrote:The question is could this be another passwordless or password manager that will be vulnerable to attack?
Every password manager is vulnerable to attack no matter how secure the creator of it may claim because they are most valuable online and everything that's available online can be vulnerable anytime unless there is a team working 24/7 to secure it.
If there's a team working on securing it is not enough if they are not updating the system hand-in-hand so that the system will always be ahead of hackers that may be targeting the ecosystem.
After the news of several attacks that were successfully launched on LastPass last year, I don't think it is smart to totally trust any password manager this day to prevent another data breach.
joanna;7671 wrote:full;7670 wrote:Yes, KYC can be risky if provided one's private information to the wrong platform but there's no way we can exclude the KYC aspect away from the cryptocurrency market.
Actually, we cant blame the Centralized exchange for requesting KYC from their users because they are just following the rules and regulations provided to them by the SEC.
Meanwhile, I believe the major cause of the KYC/AML we see in the cryptocurrency today are the crypto scammer and hackers that are abusing the decentralized cryptocurrency potential which makes the SEC intervene in the crypto market by introducing KYC/AML rules.
Apart from the KYC aspect which you guys mentioned to be the drawback of Centralized exchange, there are more drawbacks that I dislike about Centralized exchange is the higher fees. An example Binance's high withdrawal fee years ago before they make an amendment after enriching their pocket through a high withdrawal fee.
IyaJJJ;7628 wrote:joanna;7627 wrote:We can say that the UtopiaP2P ecosystem developer team create the Utopia Web proxy browser to answer the problem that people from China are experiencing.
Sort of but it was not created for the Chinese alone. It was actually created for every user of the Utopia ecosystem that needs the Web proxy to escape restriction without the need of paying or buying a VPN.
However, this was a result of the UtopiaP2P developers paying attention to the people's needs and providing speedy solutions to the issue for the betterment of the project.
Yes, since the real intention of the Utopia web proxy tool is to allow users to access websites blocked by their Internet Service Provider (ISP) or government authorities just like we see happening in China.
Today Manchester City goes out again in the English Premier League I don’t think it would be an easy game for them but with the title now in there hands they won’t want to loose it.
Manchester City today's Premier League against the West Ham United may not be easy ask you said but I only expect two things to happen in the game which is either Manchester City or the match end with a draw.
full;7434 wrote:Detroit;7397 wrote:I strongly believe that if you can't offer a standard service then you should open a business. Many businesses should be allowed to run with their cheap and poor service
I think you just misinterpreted what the user is saying because he was talking about Crypton Exchange and user Binance with the addition of the creation of business as an example.
What I can say is that the Utopia team knows what is best for the project.Sorry, I missed that. But as you said, the project developers know what's best for business for them. The Utopia community project is already doing well, I hope they don't ruin it.
I know you care about the fruitfulness of the project and so far the UtopiaP2P developer has been making the right decision for the past 4years if I'm not mistaken and I think that's nice for us to trust their instinct.
oba;7302 wrote:IyaJJJ;7301 wrote:The smart decision aspect of host a website on the UtopiaP2P network is that the website will be a means to avoid restriction, sanction, manipulation by the government and the website will be eternal.
One of the advantages of hosting a website on Utopia is that the website will be available within Utopia, gaining access to millions of like-minded Utopia users while keeping the real hosting location hidden, preserving their secrecy.
What kind of website do they host? Hosting a website is a bit more technical than what utopia is preventing it to be. So does utopia also own the domain of your website?
Any clearnet website can host on the UtopiaP2P network and yes hosting a website on Utopia is some technical but easy to execute and the above is enough to use as a guide.
oba;7336 wrote:Lanistergame2;7221 wrote:While the NFT market is not in the hype season at this time, a real product with real utility would be able to flourish and get the attention of the public.
It would be a gamble for the Utopia team and it might be better to wait for a more conducive time to launch such a project, but I am sure it would be successful tither ways.
I think the reason why the NFT market is not getting much hype is because of some naive project owner that manipulate the market and as you said it will be a gamble for Utopia to take the step now.
I will strongly disagree with that statement. Possibly you're judging from your geographical location. Here in the UK, NFT is one of the top most profitable online businesses currently.
Ok but I am not judging based on geographical location and I was judging based on the NFT global market. We all know how NFTs were the rave of the moment in the cryptocurrency market until a lot of dev jump into it just to make money.