uTalk

An added benefit of Monero would undoubtedly be the inevitable capital transfer from Monero to Crypton.

XMR/CRP and XMR/UUSD would be great, but we do need more liquidity on UUSD/USDT to make things work.

The concern is valid, however it is very important to take a pragmatic approach to the subject and recognize the drawbacks of every decision. In this case, the developers felt the drawbacks of having open source (community division through forks primarily, but also potential exploitation) outweigh the potential benefits. While it is true that having the code open makes it available for greater scrutiny and helps gain trust, it certainly does not guarantee greater security as we have seen with so many open protocols in defi today being exploited. Ultimately, the team believes trust will be established over time and the utility of the ecosystem will help gain greater adoption. The team does also intend to obtain a 3rd party audit as well, when the code is ready.

Hello Yogami,

What resources are you allocating to each bot? How much bandwidth does each have to work with? The answer is almost always insufficient resources, as bots that have dedicated bandwidth and RAM mine consistently without any interruption, I can confirm this for you.

I don't believe there's any reasonable chance for SEC action against Utopia for 2 important reasons:

1) The 1984 Group never conducted any ICO or fundraising, Utopia is completely self funded

2) There is no identifiable legal entity or individual to pursue

Anyone wishing to contribute to the ecosystem is welcome to.
API Help: utopia://help/?api API Implementation Guide: https://u.is/api_instructions.pdf
DeepLinks Help: utopia://help/?deeplinks DeepLinks Demo Site: utopia://deeplinks
Website Hosting: utopia://readme/#idyll
Support: https://support.u.is

Very impressive--reminds me of the Bitcoin white paper being translated into many languages in the early years!

Ok, I have tested the withdrawal system;

1) Although deposits are only credited to your account if they arrive from your public key, Crypton Exchange does allow you to withdraw to a public key other than your own. I sent a test withdrawal of 5 CRP to your PK.

2) When the user accidentally tries to withdraw CRP to the Public Key of the deposit address, 30B3E72F1E71805E49F4AB8C444AC5908C0044B46196D39B5C2810D80453B235, the exchange produces an error (because CRP never actually moves), but does subtract that amount from your exchange account. So this is a bug. It can be fixed by only allowing withdrawals to the public key associated with the account.

I will get support's attention to this now in the exchange chat.

Nice post. Yes, online anonymity requires great vigilance and discipline, most don't make the required effort, or at least do not sustain that effort indefinitely, since the internet has a very long memory.

The deposit issue of Lonesom2 has been resolved.

The 2 exchanges which have my personal strong recommendation are:

Crypton Exchange at https://crp.is and internally in Utopia at http://CRP
Cryptex at https://cryptex.net/

This is because LATOKEN has higher fees and limited daily withdrawals, while there have been multiple user reports indicating ZG.com can restrict customer accounts from withdrawing funds without warning unless they submit complete ID verification.

CRP Exchange and Cryptex.net feature anonymous account registration and unlimited withdrawals.

The way the Crypton Exchange implemented new user registration with the automated uMails was really nice to see. Their team received some assistance from the 1984 Group. If you have a nice project in the works, I encourage you to reach out to the team at https://support.u.is