uTalk

Vastextension;7564 wrote:

joanna;7536 wrote:

Although the shady act of some cryptocurrency scammer causes things like what you just pointed out which is sad but it also makes the government and the rest of the world see the potential of crypto. Do you know how many time the government has tried to ban/stop crypto and is unable to do it?

Yes, things like that make more people to read about cryptocurrency but it's also the reason why project like UtopiaP2P is created although it is a bad thing. Nevertheless, it give rooms for innovative, privacy and security project like Utopia

You have a point. If some cryptocurrency investors are not a victim of crypto scammers people won't look for a solution through a privacy provision project. Yes, it's somehow bad for the market but good for the UtopiaP2P ecosystem.

thrive;7629 wrote:

The question is could this be another passwordless or password manager that will be vulnerable to attack?

Every password manager is vulnerable to attack no matter how secure the creator of it may claim because they are most valuable online and everything that's available online can be vulnerable anytime unless there is a team working 24/7 to secure it.

Kelechi;7588 wrote:

full;7570 wrote:

I believe you're not the only one who has learned some lessons through the silly mistake made when you were still a newbie in the crypto market and the most important thing is not making the exact mistake again.

Firstly I am never too worried about mistakes, it's part of life but the biggest mistakes people make is when they don't try to learn from their mistakes.

As human making a mistake is one of the things that confirm us as a human being and the good thing is that mistakes are made lesson is also learned. As you said the only real mistake is not learning from previous mistakes.

full;7439 wrote:

Vastextension;7427 wrote:

You have a point about this and I could remember a friend of mine losing his BTC to a cryptocurrency exchange that suddenly shut down. Although he understands that keeping a coin on CEX for the long term is not good but he learns a hard way.

I'm sorry about the experience of your friend but there are some people that you advise about some security measure they will never listen until they learn the hard and the same thing goes for cryptocurrency that are advised to stay away from meme coin but choose to invest in it.

What you said makes sense because I was one of the people who learn a pretty good lesson when started my cryptocurrency journey some years ago and it is the same thing that help me now in the market.

full;7447 wrote:

thrive;5301 wrote:

If I have a channel on the UtopiaP2P application client is it possible to use the bot to uVoucher to channel users based on their performance on the channel or can the bot be used to do an airdrop in channel?

It will be nice to know the performance of this Utopia-protectron bot that was introduced by the original poster on this topic due to spam happening lately in some channels on the Utopia app client.

What exactly does the bot do on the utopia network? I saw some thing like protection,  does it also help to dictate scammers on the utopia network?

IyaJJJ;7551 wrote:

oba;7459 wrote:

But what I don't understand is why would anyone invest in the Dogecoin because Elon Musk a billionaire hype it when he barely has adequate knowledge about cryptocurrency.

The reason is simple but I believe it because some people see him as their role model while some see him as one of the smart guys because he's a billionaire.

The reason why some crypto investors invested in Dogecoin when Elon Musk hyped it could be one of what you stated but I still believe its lack of cryptocurrency knowledge will make anyone make an investment base on all that you said.

IyaJJJ;7545 wrote:

oba;7496 wrote:

Ok but I am not judging based on geographical location and I was judging based on the NFT global market. We all know how NFTs were the rave of the moment in the cryptocurrency market until a lot of dev jump into it just to make money.

I think you have a point people are not talking much about the NFT market now like before and most NFTs collectors that purchase some NFTs years ago are currently at a loss. Besides, I hear news about someone purchasing BAYC with thousands of dollars and selling it in a hundred last year.

With what I am currently seeing in the NFT market if there's no bullish momentum in the market after the Bitcoin block halving executed forget about the NFT market cause 80% of all the projects there will vanish.

oba;7498 wrote:

Detroit;7470 wrote:

Sorry, I missed that.  But as you said,  the project developers know what's best for business for them. The Utopia community project is already doing well, I hope they don't ruin it.

I know you care about the fruitfulness of the project and so far the UtopiaP2P developer has been making the right decision for the past 4years if I'm not mistaken and I think that's nice for us to trust their instinct.

I will make my contribution to this conversation base on how the Utopia developer team has handled the Crypton Exchange from day one and how it is still functioning now. if they could that I think their decision and move won't hurt the project.

If I have a channel on the UtopiaP2P application client is it possible to use the bot to uVoucher to channel users based on their performance on the channel or can the bot be used to do an airdrop in channel?

KingCRP;7404 wrote:

thrive;7323 wrote:

As per the manifesto, the aim of the dev team is to create an ecosystem that will uphold the values to humanity and privacy enthusiast and build a foundation that contributes to the development of a self-regulating society. Technically there's no restriction

Utopia p2p has already started to kick start that vision they have for now done there very best in giving the ecosystem those amount of utilities.

Totally correct buddy. UtopiaP2P's P2P architecture also proved this by making the network more resilient to assaults and other forms of failure. Furthermore, even if one node fails, the Utopia network can continue to function as long as other nodes remain operational.

IyaJJJ;7425 wrote:

level;7366 wrote:

From my understanding, I believe the major reason why most people keep their cryptocurrency on a centralized exchange is that they offer a convenient way for users to trade cryptocurrencies, use their coins and not be in charge of the security.

Apart from what you said, centralized exchanges operate on a centralized model, which means that a single entity controls the exchange's operations, which can lead to a warfare of interest because the central authority has complete control over the exchange's trading activity, including project delisting.

You have a point about this and I could remember a friend of mine losing his BTC to a cryptocurrency exchange that suddenly shut down. Although he understands that keeping a coin on CEX for the long term is not good but he learns a hard way.

oba;7364 wrote:

Detroit;7139 wrote:

As much as I get your point there must be a valid reason fur them to do that. Also if there's no valid reason, they must really lack business sense.

Lack of business sense, in what way? Do you think exchanges like Crypton Exchange work like Binance that can integrate any trading pairs in just a snap of fingers and ignore the privacy aspect of their service? If you have dev skill you know how hard this work.

I strongly believe that if you can't offer a standard service then you should open a business. Many businesses should be allowed to run with their cheap and poor service