uTalk

Vastextension;8637 wrote:

thrive;8636 wrote:

If we're talking about the Džeko record then we should talk about his scoring the only goal of the Inter Milan match against championship leaders Napoli, in the 2022-23 season and that exact goal is what gave Inter Milan winning

He later scored in the Inter Milan 3–0 win over AC Milan in the 2022 Supercoppa Italiana and was named Man of the Match with this goal he became the oldest goalscorer of the tournament and he break the previous record set by Cristiano Ronaldo in 2020.

Meanwhile, there's a chance for him to be the man of the match in this season's UEFA Champions League cause I believe Inter Milan has already proceeded to the next stage of the Champion league.

Vastextension;8632 wrote:

thrive;8631 wrote:

But could have thought that the same Edin Džeko who joined Inter Milan in the year 2021 whose club didn't make officially introduction of him to the world and the club fans will make it to the starting line-up not to talk about being one of their favorite players.

Meanwhile, Edin Džeko said following Inter's 2-0 victory over Milan in the first leg of the semi final that sometimes the goals don't arrive and people only talk about that, but I bring more than goals to the team.

Let us see if  Edin Džeko will bring Inter Milan more goals in there today's game. I am happy for how his career turned out to be after leaving Roma and he played beautifully for them either.

thrive;8626 wrote:

level;8615 wrote:

While AC Milan score enough goals pray they didn't consume any goals because a significant goal from the inter-milan may destroy their chance of proceeding to the next stage.

I don't think AC Milan has the chance to proceed to the next final stage of the UEFA Champions League and from what I see they have their chance in the first leg but they couldn't make good use of it. It will be hard for them to have enough chance in todays match.

This is what I also expected and most of the online odds are in support of Inter Milan winning the score leg but footing the rivalry relationship between Inter Milan and AC Milan I believe today's game will be a hot sit for both club.

Vastextension;8497 wrote:

CrytoCynthia;8491 wrote:

I don't know how true this is but Utopia p2p mining system has for long been filled with honest miners well maybe the team is still only trying to be very careful about what they do.

Maybe but if you check the information that was provided about the UtopiaP2P airdrop which was hosted on the application client. This will show you that for every great opportunity, there are some people that will want to abuse it.

According to the information provided by the UtopiaP2P team. They stated that "we have recently noticed a significant number of weak nodes appearing running Utopia. This has led to issues with the network and could potentially result in dishonest participation"

Vastextension;8488 wrote:

joanna;8487 wrote:

Despite everything you guys said. Let us hope the miners are not greedy because greed can result in corruption when people use their position of authority to use dishonest or illegal means by joining forces to manipulate the network.

Well said, i guess this is the reason why the utopiaP2P ecosystem want the mining setting of CRP coin to be healthy by introduce rules that will chase out miners that are not enthusiasts.

That's the point if such rules are not introduced to prevent environmental harm caused by greedy miners exploiting and destroying ecosystems for their financial gain, it will results in to dump in the price of CRP coin

Vastextension;8483 wrote:

oba;8482 wrote:

Wait but a 51% attack is a situation where a group of miners or a single miner get gain to control more than 50% of the computing power of a blockchain network and when this happened it literally allows them to manipulate the network's functions, thwart consensus algorithms, double-spend cryptocurrencies and impose changes without consensus across the network. That has nothing to do with what you said.

Yes, you're right but when a miners or a group have access to the 51% computing power of blockchain and they are also greed they can manipulate the network's functions just to earn more for their own selfish gain.

You have a point. For a project to defend against 51% of attacks. They have to continue upgrading their blockchain network protocols to make mining more decentralized and resistant to such attacks.

thrive;8473 wrote:

Lanistergame2;8017 wrote:

You are also right. Greed sometimes can get the better part of an individual. Though sometimes greed is good because it makes you strive hard to get more out of life but excess of it is deadly.

Greed is never something that good buddy no matter sweet and good it may look like because every greed is a product of destruction. You can strive hard in a normal way without greed but when greed is added, destruction and vast loss step in.

Nevertheless, greed is the drive for wealth and material gain, frequently at the expense of others. It may have a number of detrimental effects on both the individual and society at large.

Detroit;8301 wrote:

CrytoCynthia;8203 wrote:

On a personal note I have never judged a project or anything coin but hype? I always wait till I get involved and then I can actually be able to assess the project properly.

That's very thoughtful of you mate. Many people join and spend or invest huge amounts of money on different cryptocurrency projects based on hype without actually understanding exactly what those projects have to offer.

Let's not forget that some people genuinely want to invest in good business but really do not know how to go about it. May running some cryptocurrency-related business classes will welcome people.

joanna;8218 wrote:

IyaJJJ;8216 wrote:

The logic to stay ahead of others in every setting is to always continue building and that's what CZ Binance practices, he never feels satisfied after the creation of an innovative concept on Binance he seeks for more.

I guess this is the reason why he always uses the slogan keep building but to my knowledge the Utopia ecosystem developers are doing the same thing and that's why we see different updates on their app client.

Yes, the UtopiaP2P ecosystem developers practice also the same habit but they will have their own concept they believe the ecosystem will need and so is the users of the ecosystem.

IyaJJJ;7638 wrote:

joanna;7637 wrote:

Guys make me understand what you're trying to say since the UtopiaP2P uses Curve25519, XSalsa20, and Poly1305 algorithms to encrypt, sign, and authenticate packets and connections between users. What is more secure than that?

Additionally, Utopia Network uses a dynamic multi-link routing engine with MITM (man-in-the-middle) attack protection, so all user communication is shielded from being intercepted and read by outside parties.

Yes, the UtopiaP2P network is designed with security and privacy as its top priorities. However, the ecosystem still needs validators who act as intermediaries in transmitting data from one user to another, ensuring that all communication is encrypted using advanced algorithms. I believe this is what the users are trying to point out.

IyaJJJ;7641 wrote:

full;7640 wrote:

You guys have made a valuable point but I categorized the habit of not learning from previous mistakes as an error because, in the end, they are mostly hard to forget.

The cryptocurrency market is not for those who find it difficult to learn from past mistakes because the market can become volatile at times, and only those investors who are able to do so will profit from their subsequent investments. This may seem harsh to some.

Your statement may seem harsh to some people but you're totally telling the truth because only the cryptocurrency investors and traders that learn fast from the previous mistake always make a profit while those that didn't learn will keep making losses.

full;7670 wrote:

CrytoCynthia;6247 wrote:

It’s a risk giving out your Kyc information to any platform what so ever, so I don’t value any exchanges that desperately demands one to give out their kyc informations.

Yes, KYC can be risky if provided one's private information to the wrong platform but there's no way we can exclude the KYC aspect away from the cryptocurrency market.

Actually, we cant blame the Centralized exchange for requesting KYC from their users because they are just following the rules and regulations provided to them by the SEC.