Official forum for Utopia Community
You are not logged in.
Vastextension;8497 wrote:CrytoCynthia;8491 wrote:I don't know how true this is but Utopia p2p mining system has for long been filled with honest miners well maybe the team is still only trying to be very careful about what they do.
Maybe but if you check the information that was provided about the UtopiaP2P airdrop which was hosted on the application client. This will show you that for every great opportunity, there are some people that will want to abuse it.
According to the information provided by the UtopiaP2P team. They stated that "we have recently noticed a significant number of weak nodes appearing running Utopia. This has led to issues with the network and could potentially result in dishonest participation"
Yes, that's what they said but it's a sign that some people will take advantage of the vulnerability and the UtopiaP2P developer team being an experienced team that always checks all the Utopia network notices it and decide to pause the airdrop.
Vastextension;8488 wrote:joanna;8487 wrote:Despite everything you guys said. Let us hope the miners are not greedy because greed can result in corruption when people use their position of authority to use dishonest or illegal means by joining forces to manipulate the network.
Well said, i guess this is the reason why the utopiaP2P ecosystem want the mining setting of CRP coin to be healthy by introduce rules that will chase out miners that are not enthusiasts.
I don't know how true this is but Utopia p2p mining system has for long been filled with honest miners well maybe the team is still only trying to be very careful about what they do.
Maybe but if you check the information that was provided about the UtopiaP2P airdrop which was hosted on the application client. This will show you that for every great opportunity, there are some people that will want to abuse it.
Vastextension;8488 wrote:joanna;8487 wrote:Despite everything you guys said. Let us hope the miners are not greedy because greed can result in corruption when people use their position of authority to use dishonest or illegal means by joining forces to manipulate the network.
Well said, i guess this is the reason why the utopiaP2P ecosystem want the mining setting of CRP coin to be healthy by introduce rules that will chase out miners that are not enthusiasts.
That's the point if such rules are not introduced to prevent environmental harm caused by greedy miners exploiting and destroying ecosystems for their financial gain, it will results in to dump in the price of CRP coin
For the good of all, it is good that the miners we have should only be people who are enthusiasts of this great project not people that values their own benefit beyond the healthy of the project network.
oba;8486 wrote:thrive;8484 wrote:You have a point. For a project to defend against 51% of attacks. They have to continue upgrading their blockchain network protocols to make mining more decentralized and resistant to such attacks.
In addition to implementing advanced cryptographic hashing techniques, it is advised that better regulation and secure blockchain networks be in place to thwart these attacks.
Despite everything you guys said. Let us hope the miners are not greedy because greed can result in corruption when people use their position of authority to use dishonest or illegal means by joining forces to manipulate the network.
Well said, i guess this is the reason why the utopiaP2P ecosystem want the mining setting of CRP coin to be healthy by introduce rules that will chase out miners that are not enthusiasts.
Vastextension;8483 wrote:oba;8482 wrote:Wait but a 51% attack is a situation where a group of miners or a single miner get gain to control more than 50% of the computing power of a blockchain network and when this happened it literally allows them to manipulate the network's functions, thwart consensus algorithms, double-spend cryptocurrencies and impose changes without consensus across the network. That has nothing to do with what you said.
Yes, you're right but when a miners or a group have access to the 51% computing power of blockchain and they are also greed they can manipulate the network's functions just to earn more for their own selfish gain.
You have a point. For a project to defend against 51% of attacks. They have to continue upgrading their blockchain network protocols to make mining more decentralized and resistant to such attacks.
Yes. However, a 51 percent attack, which illustrates the susceptibility of blockchain network protocols to malicious attacks, is a worrying possibility in the context of cryptocurrencies.
Vastextension;8481 wrote:oba;8475 wrote:Nevertheless, greed is the drive for wealth and material gain, frequently at the expense of others. It may have a number of detrimental effects on both the individual and society at large.
Greed can cause people and businesses to take advantage of others for financial gain, using their resources and influence without regard for morality to maximize profits. Meanwhile this is what causes 51% attack in the cryptocurrency market.
Wait but a 51% attack is a situation where a group of miners or a single miner get gain to control more than 50% of the computing power of a blockchain network and when this happened it literally allows them to manipulate the network's functions, thwart consensus algorithms, double-spend cryptocurrencies and impose changes without consensus across the network. That has nothing to do with what you said.
Yes, you're right but when a miners or a group have access to the 51% computing power of blockchain and they are also greed they can manipulate the network's functions just to earn more for their own selfish gain.
thrive;8473 wrote:Lanistergame2;8017 wrote:You are also right. Greed sometimes can get the better part of an individual. Though sometimes greed is good because it makes you strive hard to get more out of life but excess of it is deadly.
Greed is never something that good buddy no matter sweet and good it may look like because every greed is a product of destruction. You can strive hard in a normal way without greed but when greed is added, destruction and vast loss step in.
Nevertheless, greed is the drive for wealth and material gain, frequently at the expense of others. It may have a number of detrimental effects on both the individual and society at large.
Greed can cause people and businesses to take advantage of others for financial gain, using their resources and influence without regard for morality to maximize profits. Meanwhile this is what causes 51% attack in the cryptocurrency market.
Utopia p2p is a complete package that has virtual every necessary for someone in the cryptocurrency game.
UtopiaP2P being a complete package is the reason why it was deemed as all in one kit for every innovative concept that has to do with privacy, security, gaming, passive income, ChatGPT, and more.
Detroit;8301 wrote:CrytoCynthia;8203 wrote:On a personal note I have never judged a project or anything coin but hype? I always wait till I get involved and then I can actually be able to assess the project properly.
That's very thoughtful of you mate. Many people join and spend or invest huge amounts of money on different cryptocurrency projects based on hype without actually understanding exactly what those projects have to offer.
Let's not forget that some people genuinely want to invest in good business but really do not know how to go about it. May running some cryptocurrency-related business classes will welcome people.
You have a good point and the people that are in this position are newbies that just join the cryptocurrency investment market but they can easily get along if they seek knowledge first and always go for projects that provide solutions.
joanna;8213 wrote:full;8212 wrote:Footing have you a point I wonder why some people still consider that the UtopiaP2P developer still has some sort of community engagement when they are already doing the engagement in their own way.
Someone already suggests that there should be a form of communication and request between the community users and the developer to share knowledge about features that would move the Utopia project forward.
I believe the UtopiaP2P project development team has already created a platform for this. Mind you, the project is a product of 3-4 years of research. Having said that, the community can have some suggestions or discussions with the developer on support.u.is
Hmm. That's correct. I could remember a user advising me to make use of the link to contact the UtopiaP2P team for suggestions weeks ago before I talk with some of the representatives on the application client.
joanna;8218 wrote:IyaJJJ;8216 wrote:The logic to stay ahead of others in every setting is to always continue building and that's what CZ Binance practices, he never feels satisfied after the creation of an innovative concept on Binance he seeks for more.
I guess this is the reason why he always uses the slogan keep building but to my knowledge the Utopia ecosystem developers are doing the same thing and that's why we see different updates on their app client.
Yes, the UtopiaP2P ecosystem developers practice also the same habit but they will have their own concept they believe the ecosystem will need and so is the users of the ecosystem.
Hmm. If the concept research and planned by the UtopiaP2P developers with merged with the user's concept I believe the UtopiaP2P ecosystem will be unstoppable and the leading project.
oba;8166 wrote:IyaJJJ;8165 wrote:Both of you have some point cause the UtopiaP2P developer participation and communication with the community will somehow impact the trust of some users of the ecosystem into having more enthusiasm for the project. However, I don't see that affecting their privacy.
I think they are somehow on the same side because they are saying something that will push the UtopiaP2P project forward but the developers of the ecosystem have already engaged in community engagement and community participation.
I think the major cause of some users seeking the ecosystem developer community engagement and community participation is because they want more from them because it's something that's not hidden that the developer is on the "Chat lobby channel" and they are always responding to issue whenever they are on sit.
In some cases it depends on each investor's personal understanding. Satoshi never engages in any form of community engagement and community participation to preserve his privacy. I guess that what the user said "Utopia needs to secure their team privacy either since"
IyaJJJ;7638 wrote:joanna;7637 wrote:Guys make me understand what you're trying to say since the UtopiaP2P uses Curve25519, XSalsa20, and Poly1305 algorithms to encrypt, sign, and authenticate packets and connections between users. What is more secure than that?
Additionally, Utopia Network uses a dynamic multi-link routing engine with MITM (man-in-the-middle) attack protection, so all user communication is shielded from being intercepted and read by outside parties.
Yes, the UtopiaP2P network is designed with security and privacy as its top priorities. However, the ecosystem still needs validators who act as intermediaries in transmitting data from one user to another, ensuring that all communication is encrypted using advanced algorithms. I believe this is what the users are trying to point out.
Yes, that's the exact thing the users are trying to say because the duty of UtopiaP2P network validators which are also known as server nodes, is maintaining the security and privacy of the network.
Vastextension;7581 wrote:full;7568 wrote:No, according to what the original poster of this topic said. The duty of the bot is to filter and remove all the unwanted possible scam post in a channel.
Yes, the bot was created to enable required anti-spam filters but I have never seen anyone of the Utopia application client use it before. Does it mean the op quit?
Although, I don't have the tech knowledge about how bot are created but i believe the user spent his valuable time creating the bot and I don't expect him either to just quit like that not minding the time he spent developing the bot.
Time spent on creating a bot depends on the advanced knowledge and skills of the creator with the inclusion of the functionality the bot will provide. I think the user is enthusiastic about this project and I don't expect him to give up on something easily.
IyaJJJ;7641 wrote:full;7640 wrote:You guys have made a valuable point but I categorized the habit of not learning from previous mistakes as an error because, in the end, they are mostly hard to forget.
The cryptocurrency market is not for those who find it difficult to learn from past mistakes because the market can become volatile at times, and only those investors who are able to do so will profit from their subsequent investments. This may seem harsh to some.
Your statement may seem harsh to some people but you're totally telling the truth because only the cryptocurrency investors and traders that learn fast from the previous mistake always make a profit while those that didn't learn will keep making losses.
Hmm, this explains the reason why some cryptocurrency traders quit at some point while some investors complained about making losses. I guess this is the reason why people are advised not to introduce cryptocurrency to kids.
full;7649 wrote:joanna;7648 wrote:Every password manager is vulnerable to attack no matter how secure the creator of it may claim because they are most valuable online and everything that's available online can be vulnerable anytime unless there is a team working 24/7 to secure it.
If there's a team working on securing it is not enough if they are not updating the system hand-in-hand so that the system will always be ahead of hackers that may be targeting the ecosystem.
After the news of several attacks that were successfully launched on LastPass last year, I don't think it is smart to totally trust any password manager this day to prevent another data breach.
Meanwhile, LastPass was not the only password manager that has been hacked, and for the record Dashlane, Keeper, 1Password, and RoboForm have been hacked either.
full;7670 wrote:CrytoCynthia;6247 wrote:It’s a risk giving out your Kyc information to any platform what so ever, so I don’t value any exchanges that desperately demands one to give out their kyc informations.
Yes, KYC can be risky if provided one's private information to the wrong platform but there's no way we can exclude the KYC aspect away from the cryptocurrency market.
Actually, we cant blame the Centralized exchange for requesting KYC from their users because they are just following the rules and regulations provided to them by the SEC.
Meanwhile, I believe the major cause of the KYC/AML we see in the cryptocurrency today are the crypto scammer and hackers that are abusing the decentralized cryptocurrency potential which makes the SEC intervene in the crypto market by introducing KYC/AML rules.
joanna;7627 wrote:thrive;7625 wrote:Yes, the use of VPN, socks, or proxy shouldn't be an issue after UtopiaP2P introduced their web proxy browser which can use to surf all Clearnet websites to avoid restriction and some sort of boundary but if you look at the date this topic was created it was before the launch of the UtopiaP2P web proxy.
We can say that the UtopiaP2P ecosystem developer team create the Utopia Web proxy browser to answer the problem that people from China are experiencing.
Sort of but it was not created for the Chinese alone. It was actually created for every user of the Utopia ecosystem that needs the Web proxy to escape restriction without the need of paying or buying a VPN.
However, this was a result of the UtopiaP2P developers paying attention to the people's needs and providing speedy solutions to the issue for the betterment of the project.
thrive;7620 wrote:Kelechi;7590 wrote:Brighton has always been a very stubborn team, they have many times shocked the big team, I feel this would be an interesting encounter.
A club like Brighton and Hove Albion is one of the major threats to big football club teams in the Premier League game but I believe Manchester City wont to have the experience they had in the FA Cup
That's true. I believe you wanted to say Manchester United here, if so. Yes, they have an encounter with Brighton and Hove Albion at the FA Cup Semi-final which was a hot sit for Manchester United and all their fans.
Yes, I did remember the FA Cup semi-final that was played last month. I bet on the game and my hope is that I lost the bet until Manchester United defeated Brighton and Hove Albion by penalty.
joanna;7631 wrote:Kelechi;7542 wrote:How about having a beginner and help board for those who are new and those who would also be coming in soon into the forum.
I don't think we need to have a "beginner and help" board since the forum already has the "question and help" board which can handle both the beginner issue and experienced user.
You have a good point with your statement. the question and help board section should be able to handle both without any issue but the best to contact the developer team for any issue will still be through the Utopia application client.
The UtopiaP2P application client may handle about 80% aspect of this project but it's definitely not meant for everything and likewise are the developer that's on the application client.
joanna;7683 wrote:Privacy consider is one of the reasons why I never use Apple phones as my hot phone. Yes, the features and the functionality of the phone are good and it's indeed top-notch the privacy level of it is a no for me.
One man's food is another poison they say. What you see as your own drawback is the reason why some people choose the Apple phones over any other phones in the market and there's no phone that can compete with Apple phones in the market as we speak.
You have a point because 95% of the people that uses Apple phones use them because of the level of security it provided and the unique feature it had which other mobile phone now imitate.
joanna;7618 wrote:thrive;7617 wrote:You have a point. If some cryptocurrency investors are not a victim of crypto scammers people won't look for a solution through a privacy provision project. Yes, it's somehow bad for the market but good for the UtopiaP2P ecosystem.
I agree with you but there are many reason for the creation of the UtopiaP2P ecosystem and it's not only about privacy provision alone. For the record, The UtopiaP2P ecosystem provides a broad range of features, including instant messaging, voice messaging, file transfer, channels to run a blog or news feed, and group chat. Users can also host websites, accept and make payments, and make use of a decentralized domain name system. All these features and those I didn't mention shouldn't be ignored.
We cant talk about UtopiaP2P and not mention the cryptocurrency specifically their own stablecoin, the UtopiaUSD (UUSD), which is a game changer and the only privacy stablecoin which also secure, fast, and reliable, with a stable value pegged to the USD.
Generally, UtopiaP2P is a great choice for people who are worried about privacy, security, and innovation as well as those who are looking for a community that supports freedom of speech and self-expression. a variety of features, as well as earning potential.
oba;7377 wrote:joanna;7376 wrote:Agree with what you said and the good thing is that negative news with the inclusion of their FUD always be beneficial in the long run for crypto as a whole to get more traffic and more people trying to learn about it.
You a point. Negative news not only attracts short-term attention and causes transient increases in trading volumes, but it may also instill fear, confusion, and doubt among investors, discouraging them from investing in cryptocurrency. However, it create an opportunity to buy low and later there will be bullish and huge traffic.
Meanwhile, the cryptocurrency market have reach the realm of positive trends include greater usage, healthy market competition, and technical breakthroughs.
Negative news and fud are more likely to help the cryptocurrency market achieve more serious adoption.
Although the negative may help the cryptocurrency market to get more read and exposure but it will first cause some dump in price of market before the bullish will occur.
Detroit;7478 wrote:full;7447 wrote:It will be nice to know the performance of this Utopia-protectron bot that was introduced by the original poster on this topic due to spam happening lately in some channels on the Utopia app client.
What exactly does the bot do on the utopia network? I saw some thing like protection, does it also help to dictate scammers on the utopia network?
No, according to what the original poster of this topic said. The duty of the bot is to filter and remove all the unwanted possible scam post in a channel.
Yes, the bot was created to enable required anti-spam filters but I have never seen anyone of the Utopia application client use it before. Does it mean the op quit?
The demand for a given NFT, its uniqueness, the reputation of the artist or creator, and the overall acceptance of NFTs as a form of investment are just a few of the variables that affect how profitable NFTs are.
Despite the fact that NFTs have the potential to become a new asset class, investors should exercise caution when using funds they cannot afford to lose, and they should only invest in NFTs after carefully weighing the risks and rewards.