Official forum for Utopia Community
You are not logged in.
Detroit;7220 wrote:It doesn't have to be people to do it. They can find away to incorporate it into the blockchain system. Many people do not know the difference between closed-source or open sources or scam projects.
It is incorporated into the system and anyone who knows what they are doing would be able to find out. Also anyone who does not know how to check can their research cause there would be content online about which project is open source or closed source.
Some who are aware of trust wallet not being open source found out through other people's comments on it.
We are in 21 century and I don't think it should be hard for anyone to know or differentiate the difference between open-source and close source projects if they are not the lazy type that only rely on people's comments.
Lanistergame2;7223 wrote:thrive;7202 wrote:Technically those that invested in Dogecoin when Elon Musk hype it through Twitter are at loss. There's no one to blame but their naivety about cryptocurrency investment.
Not everyone. There would always be those who were quick enough to make a purchase in anticipation of the spike in the peice after the news announcement and sold off as the price was rising.
For there to be people that made a loss while investing there has to be those that dumped on them who made a profit
Maybe there are people who anticipated the and purchase the dogecoin and also sell off before the dump but the chance of it happening is 50% because most people that do that will only sell some portion of theor holding.
But what I don't understand is why would anyone invest in the Dogecoin because Elon Musk a billionaire hype it when he barely has adequate knowledge about cryptocurrency.
Dozie;7289 wrote:Kelechi;7288 wrote:I believe it's should also be a personal decisions those who wants to use the mobile version of the application should feel free to use it and those who prefer the desktop version should all be able to use it.
Yes I think you have a point and I respect that but in all you still have to explain to everyone the benefits and the non benefits of using any of the version of the application.
It’s very obvious mate, the mobile application only contains the channels available on the application but the desktop version of the application contains many more utilities that are very important.
Out of curiosity. When was the last time you use the UtopiaP2P mobile application client? Because the last time I checked the Utopia mobile application had ChatGPT AI assistant features despite the mobile being in the beta stage.
Vastextension;7431 wrote:Dozie;7270 wrote:I joined cryptocurrency early this year although I had the wrong briefing and it resulted in me making wrong choices I have actually changed all that and has started developing my skills.
I have join this movement long ago and this forum either but was away due to some certain personal issue and i decided to hop back in since this forum is getting more traffic.
The anonymity provided by Utopia which can't be found anywhere is the reason why I choose to be one of the project enthusiasts.I have to support you on this one, the Anonymity that is available on Utopia p2p is hardly found any where in the cryptocurrency space, I believe this makes Utopia p2p indispensable.
There's no doubt about the UtopiaP2P ecosystem being indispensable but there's always competition in the cryptocurrency market and for the UtopiaP2P to continue as an indispensable project the dev team needs to do some upgrades from time to time.
full;7096 wrote:joanna;7060 wrote:Hmm. Oh my Gosh. It's true.There's a lot of article writers that are doing so much damage to the market than helping the market because they are never enthusiast of the cryptocurrency and blockchain technology.
Meanwhile, we can not exclude these people from the market despite the damage they are doing to the market because they also help the cryptocurrency market get the needed awareness although it is in a bad way but the true potential of crypto will make people see the positive side of it.
You are somehow right no matter how bad the damage the cause to the market there's always something good it will lead to when the people see the truth about the fud they caused.
No matter how bad the damage they did, there's something good it always led to. Like SEC introducing KYC/AML rules and also planning to regulate the crypto market, isn't it?
In case we still have some people who are naive about the UtopiaP2P web proxy.
It is a feature on the UtopiaP2P ecosystem that allows users to browse all Clearnet website anonymously and securely without disclosing their identity or physical location.
The euro is fast approaching I believe if there is going to be any CRP competition concerning football it has to be during the euros although it may happen anytime.
Honestly, it will be nice if we have an event for another football competition contest on this forum. Let's wait and see if the UtopiaP2P team we have an interest in it.
oba;7367 wrote:level;7365 wrote:Same here but the sad thing is that when the result of their naiveness happened they will put the blame on cryptocurrency not being good to them where as they are the ones that built themselves a grave of losses.
There's nothing we can do about that than to always make a positive comment about cryptocurrency in our own way because there will always be some people that will have negative things to say about cryptocurrency.
Agree with what you said and the good thing is that negative news with the inclusion of their FUD always be beneficial in the long run for crypto as a whole to get more traffic and more people trying to learn about it.
You a point. Negative news not only attracts short-term attention and causes transient increases in trading volumes, but it may also instill fear, confusion, and doubt among investors, discouraging them from investing in cryptocurrency. However, it create an opportunity to buy low and later there will be bullish and huge traffic.
KingCRP;7262 wrote:CrytoCynthia;7257 wrote:Many people has there various reasons for investing in cryptocurrency some see it as a point of investment where they can make quick money by investing, others see the more futuristic aspect of cryptocurrency.
The truth be told many people are joining the Cryptocurrency market just because of the monetary benefits they are hoping to get from it, most of the time they actually lose what they invested.
The monetary benefit will always be the end goal but i joined the UtopiaP2P project because i see the exact thing i saw in Bitcoin on the project and i like the fact that the project cryptocurrencies are decentralized.
The confidentiality and the aim of the UtopiaP2P developer team about making privacy available from all angles. What I foresee is that after they successfully execute it a lot of people will join in and when the time comes the early bird will have the most benefit.
thrive;7299 wrote:https://i.imgur.com/Of2Jeej.png
Just some years ago, a lateral movement was a tactic limited to APT cybercriminal groups and nation-state operators. Today, however, it's a commercial tool that matches the skill set of any ransomware threat actor. This makes real-time detection and prevention of lateral movement a must for organizations of all sizes and in all industries. But the troubling truth is that there are virtually no tools in the current security stack that can provide this kind of real-time protection, which can be the most serious security hole in an organization's security architecture. In this article, we'll explore the most important questions about the lateral movement protection challenge, learn why multi-factor authentication (MFA) and service account protection are the gaps that make it possible, and learn how the Silverfort platform can light up the table. attackers and finally provides lateral movement protection in your hands.I think as the world get technologically advanced so is our potential risk of scammers, hackers and so much more. It’s important to always protect and secure one self during this times.
That's correct. It is important for us to make security our priority especially now that cryptocurrency is getting more attention and awareness but the best to go about this is knowing the right thing to do and what to avoid.
level;7371 wrote:oba;7370 wrote:Technically, yes that's the reason. However, Centralized exchanges also provide limited access and also have some restrictions which can be annoying at some point not to talk about the KYC/AML requirements.
What I dislike about centralized exchanges is the loss of privacy because centralized exchange transactions are typically recorded and recognizable on a public blockchain. This puts consumers' privacy at risk if they value anonymity.
Security problems, regulatory risks, limited accessibility, and lack of privacy are all potential consequences of centralized exchanges. This is why I enjoy the idea of the Crypton Exchange.
Almost everyone that understands the concept of the Crypton Exchange enjoys and appreciates the solution it brings and how it's going to change the cryptocurrency anonymous trading platform.
oba;7368 wrote:level;7366 wrote:From my understanding, I believe the major reason why most people keep their cryptocurrency on a centralized exchange is that they offer a convenient way for users to trade cryptocurrencies, use their coins and not be in charge of the security.
I would only go with the convenience to be the reason because Centralized exchanges seem to be more vulnerable to security risks, and that include hack attackers which end result was the loss of crypto user's funds, and also damage the reputation of the exchange.
This is also the reason why a lot of cryptocurrency enthusiasts focus more on hardware wallets and according to the news the number of hardware wallet users increased rapidly last year
Technically, yes that's the reason. However, Centralized exchanges also provide limited access and also have some restrictions which can be annoying at some point not to talk about the KYC/AML requirements.
KAMSI_UG;7353 wrote:joanna;7331 wrote:You are absolutely correct about that but some people still misunderstand that the SAFU provided by centralized exchange doesn't save their cryptocurrency investment especially those that didn't use privacy service.
How can any cryptocurrency enthusiast in the present day still save their funds on the exchange, this is the biggest risk anyone can have so far, saving your coin on an exchange is like inventing problems for yourself.
From my understanding, I believe the major reason why most people keep their cryptocurrency on a centralized exchange is that they offer a convenient way for users to trade cryptocurrencies, use their coins and not be in charge of the security.
I would only go with the convenience to be the reason because Centralized exchanges seem to be more vulnerable to security risks, and that include hack attackers which end result was the loss of crypto user's funds, and also damage the reputation of the exchange.
oba;7363 wrote:level;7362 wrote:If the newbies never stop the habit of earning first whereas they ought to learn first before diving into the earning aspect. There is no way they won't always be the prey in the cryptocurrency cause the influencers will always use them to achieve their goals.
I know this may look cruel to some people but I never for once feel sorry for the newbies whose aim was about making earning through cryptocurrency but ignore the most vital thing in the crypto space.
Same here but the sad thing is that when the result of their naiveness happened they will put the blame on cryptocurrency not being good to them where as they are the ones that built themselves a grave of losses.
There's nothing we can do about that than to always make a positive comment about cryptocurrency in our own way because there will always be some people that will have negative things to say about cryptocurrency.
oba;7103 wrote:Camavinga;7075 wrote:You are very correct, but i think maybe there is a real and genuine reason why Utopia cannot add extra trading pairs for now, but since we are not working closely with the team we do not know, i believe in the future there will be more volume in the exchange, but for now people have to use it for the other wonderful features it offers.
Let's get this straight, the true intention of the developer team is to provide an ecosystem that will ease the burden of cryptocurrency enthusiasts and also provide a form of security in terms of privacy and investment. Therefore, I don't see any reason why they will choose not to add more pairs on the Crypton Exchange if there's no tangible reason.
As much as I get your point there must be a valid reason fur them to do that. Also if there's no valid reason, they must really lack business sense.
Lack of business sense, in what way? Do you think exchanges like Crypton Exchange work like Binance that can integrate any trading pairs in just a snap of fingers and ignore the privacy aspect of their service? If you have dev skill you know how hard this work.
CrytoCynthia;7347 wrote:level;7341 wrote:You're quite right because some newbies are a pain in the butt but if they focus only on making money there's no way they are going to maximize the profit they ought to make if they didn't understand the fundamentals.
Many newbies active now aren’t here to learn, some of them are actually trying to earn immediately. I don’t have anything against earning but you must have to learn first.
If the newbies never stop the habit of earning first whereas they ought to learn first before diving into the earning aspect. There is no way they won't always be the prey in the cryptocurrency cause the influencers will always use them to achieve their goals.
I know this may look cruel to some people but I never for once feel sorry for the newbies whose aim was about making earning through cryptocurrency but ignore the most vital thing in the crypto space.
KingCRP;7177 wrote:The NFT market place isn’t a flourish sector as it once was so I would not also pay so much attention on it, Let’s all relax and watch how Utopia p2p keeps dropping more Utilities.
While the NFT market is not in the hype season at this time, a real product with real utility would be able to flourish and get the attention of the public.
It would be a gamble for the Utopia team and it might be better to wait for a more conducive time to launch such a project, but I am sure it would be successful tither ways.
I think the reason why the NFT market is not getting much hype is because of some naive project owner that manipulate the market and as you said it will be a gamble for Utopia to take the step now.
thrive;7202 wrote:Technically those that invested in Dogecoin when Elon Musk hype it through Twitter are at loss. There's no one to blame but their naivety about cryptocurrency investment.
Not everyone. There would always be those who were quick enough to make a purchase in anticipation of the spike in the peice after the news announcement and sold off as the price was rising.
For there to be people that made a loss while investing there has to be those that dumped on them who made a profit
Maybe there are people who anticipated the and purchase the dogecoin and also sell off before the dump but the chance of it happening is 50% because most people that do that will only sell some portion of theor holding.
oba;7327 wrote:thrive;7326 wrote:I don't know if you guys nothing that CZ already has a lot of enemies ever since his acquisition of bankrupt cryptocurrency companies and he's just playing cool in other not to add fuel to the fire. Do you know any fud create about him?
You have a point. What you said here reminds me of when the rapper 50Cent bought Mike Tyson's house when he was experiencing financial issues. One of Tyson's friends shot 50Cent 8times and he was lucky to survive the shot.
Maybe what you guys said is the reason why CZ is somehow biased but from my own understanding i believe he doesn't want to abuse his influencer power that's the reason why he was most focus on the success of his project.
CZ is just an experienced and good businessman. I believe he knows what's he doing because when you're winning in the game you don't show much of your potential. Let the market do the talking and talk less in other not to have more enemy more than those that are already beefing your success.
Dozie;7293 wrote:KingCRP;7155 wrote:Well the popular way to rate an exchange that is widely use is the active and the popularity of the Exchange and with that I think LBank exchange can’t be in the top ten.
Many times this popular exchanges has actually failed us in so many ways, I don't think I would rate an exchange now by it's popularity, it's not a popularity contest.
Ready or not? You should always expect disappointment and failed service from Centralized exchanges because they are mostly control by the government and the owner of the exchange. Besides, the decision of the government is what determines their next move.
Yes, Centralized exchange can easily fail or manipulated by the government and that's why people are advised not to keep their cryptocurrency on there for a long time.
IyaJJJ;7325 wrote:KingCRP;7248 wrote:I personally don’t consider CZ as an influencer, he is pretty much bias, I see him as a business man and all his does is promote his investment regardless of the consequences.
Yes, he's somehow biased because he only focuses on developing his project and his reputation rather than creating some form of manipulating promotion message like Elon Musk.
I don't know if you guys nothing that CZ already has a lot of enemies ever since his acquisition of bankrupt cryptocurrency companies and he's just playing cool in other not to add fuel to the fire. Do you know any fud create about him?
You have a point. What you said here reminds me of when the rapper 50Cent bought Mike Tyson's house when he was experiencing financial issues. One of Tyson's friends shot 50Cent 8times and he was lucky to survive the shot.
JONSNOWING;7192 wrote:IyaJJJ;7189 wrote:Those newbies who learn about the 21st-century technology in the right way and also make the best smart decision are those that took their time to learn about the beauty of the technology before adding the earning aspect.
With the possibilities the Cryptocurrency space offers I believe it's time more people understand the value of Cryptocurrency and I suggest that if it's possible Cryptocurrency should be taught in schools.
Cryptocurrency and blockchain are already taught in some schools in the US, and EU countries it just only a few people know about this. Besides, I read that some schools also accept cryptocurrency as an intuition fee.
The schools I'm sure that are offering cryptocurrency courses include Harvard University, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Oxford University, National University of Singapore, Cornell University, and the University of California Berkeley.
Many people has there various reasons for investing in cryptocurrency some see it as a point of investment where they can make quick money by investing, others see the more futuristic aspect of cryptocurrency.
There is no doubt that people opt to invest in bitcoin for a variety of reasons, but the main one is always the possibility for high profits. We are also aware that cryptocurrencies have had substantial growth over the years, with some witnessing large price increases in a short period of time. Investors are hoping to get in early and profit from the boom.
The 2023 cryptocurrency world hasn’t really picked off as many would have loved it to but nevertheless we anticipate that there might be a huge break coming soon.
If you ask me I will say that people who believe the cryptocurrency hasn't picked off are just naive about the market trend before the total bullish market start and if the huge break happens soon you also expect a dump in price soon.
I want to understand something, there is a limit to the amount of CRP you can send to a person ordinarily but why is there no limit to the amount of uVouchers you can send out to people.
I have never for once seen a limit to the amount of CRP coin every user can send to another person and what determine the amount of CRP coin a user can send is the wallet balance.