uTalk

CrytoCynthia;7453 wrote:

Vastextension;7431 wrote:

I have join this movement long ago and this forum either but was away due to some certain personal issue and i decided to hop back in since this forum is getting more traffic.
The anonymity provided by Utopia which can't be found anywhere is the reason why I choose to be one of the project enthusiasts.

I have to support you on this one, the Anonymity that is available on Utopia p2p is hardly found any where in the cryptocurrency space, I believe this makes Utopia p2p indispensable.

There's no doubt about the UtopiaP2P ecosystem being indispensable but there's always competition in the cryptocurrency market and for the UtopiaP2P to continue as an indispensable project the dev team needs to do some upgrades from time to time.

oba;7489 wrote:

Lanistergame2;7222 wrote:

It is incorporated into the system and anyone who knows what they are doing would be able to find out. Also anyone who does not know how to check can their research cause there would be content online about which project is open source or closed source.

Some who are aware of trust wallet not being open source found out through other people's comments on it.

We are in 21 century and I don't think it should be hard for anyone to know or differentiate the difference between open-source and close source projects if they are not the lazy type that only rely on people's comments.

Meanwhile relying on people's comments is one of the important things a cryptocurrency enthusiast must ignore that's if the person wants to go far in this crypto market and also make a profit either.

level;7546 wrote:

IyaJJJ;7545 wrote:

I think you have a point people are not talking much about the NFT market now like before and most NFTs collectors that purchase some NFTs years ago are currently at a loss. Besides, I hear news about someone purchasing BAYC with thousands of dollars and selling it in a hundred last year.

With what I am currently seeing in the NFT market if there's no bullish momentum in the market after the Bitcoin block halving executed forget about the NFT market cause 80% of all the projects there will vanish.

Normally, bearish always exposes the weak project and this is the first bearish market the NFT market will experience after the existence of NFTs. Let's wait and see what will really happen.

joanna;7333 wrote:

full;7096 wrote:

Meanwhile, we can not exclude these people from the market despite the damage they are doing to the market because they also help the cryptocurrency market get the needed awareness although it is in a bad way but the true potential of crypto will make people see the positive side of it.

You are somehow right no matter how bad the damage the cause to the market there's always something good it will lead to when the people see the truth about the fud they caused.

No matter how bad the damage they did, there's something good it always led to. Like SEC introducing KYC/AML rules and also planning to regulate the crypto market, isn't it?

IyaJJJ;7322 wrote:

thrive;7321 wrote:

I think the web proxy was a gift to the privacy space by the UtopiaP2P ecosystem because a lot of Utopia users complain about the limited access of website on the Idyll browser and since Idyll is tor alternative it will work for the Clearnet site.

It was indeed a gift to the user of the Utopia network but some people seem not to understand that Web Proxy is not a separate Utopia P2P tool. It only works in the ecosystem but use to browse all Clearnet sites.

I'm surprised some people still dont understand that the total privacy provision of the UtopiaP2P ecosystem is provided through their application client and for the Web proxy to provide adequate privacy it has to be on the app client.

CrytoCynthia;7347 wrote:

level;7341 wrote:

You're quite right because some newbies are a pain in the butt but if they focus only on making money there's no way they are going to maximize the profit they ought to make if they didn't understand the fundamentals.

Many newbies active now aren’t here to learn, some of them are actually trying to earn immediately. I don’t have anything against earning but you must have to learn first.

Well one thing I don’t support is generalizing things, yes some newbies actually don’t care about learning but there are still many newbies out there who always want to learn let support them.

joanna;7311 wrote:

JONSNOWING;7298 wrote:

I want to understand something, there is a limit to the amount of CRP you can send to a person ordinarily but why is there no limit to the amount of uVouchers you can send out to people.

Normally just ask if you are able to make use of your CRP when creating uVoucher you're supposed to send your CRP balance either through a transaction if you haven't used your wallet to participate in mining or something.

I thought you can only make use of CRP Crypton for the uVoucher, is it possible to use any other coin for the uVoucher? Also can you use the stablecoin of Utopia p2p UUSD.

level;7365 wrote:

oba;7363 wrote:

I know this may look cruel to some people but I never for once feel sorry for the newbies whose aim was about making earning through cryptocurrency but ignore the most vital thing in the crypto space.

Same here but the sad thing is that when the result of their naiveness happened they will put the blame on cryptocurrency not being good to them where as they are the ones that built themselves a grave of losses.

There's nothing we can do about that than to always make a positive comment about cryptocurrency in our own way because there will always be some people that will have negative things to say about cryptocurrency.

level;7366 wrote:

KAMSI_UG;7353 wrote:

How can any cryptocurrency enthusiast in the present day still save their funds on the exchange, this is the biggest risk anyone can have so far, saving your coin on an exchange is like inventing problems for yourself.

From my understanding, I believe the major reason why most people keep their cryptocurrency on a centralized exchange is that they offer a convenient way for users to trade cryptocurrencies, use their coins and not be in charge of the security.

I would only go with the convenience to be the reason because Centralized exchanges seem to be more vulnerable to security risks, and that include hack attackers which end result was the loss of crypto user's funds, and also damage the reputation of the exchange.

Lanistergame2;7221 wrote:

KingCRP;7177 wrote:

The NFT market place isn’t a flourish sector as it once was so I would not also pay so much attention on it, Let’s all relax and watch how Utopia p2p keeps dropping more Utilities.

While the NFT market is not in the hype season at this time, a real product with real utility would be able to flourish and get the attention of the public.

It would be a gamble for the Utopia team and it might be better to wait for a more conducive time to launch such a project, but I am sure it would be successful tither ways.

I think the reason why the NFT market is not getting much hype is because of some naive project owner that manipulate the market and as you said it will be a gamble for Utopia to take the step now.

joanna;7060 wrote:

full;7059 wrote:

I believe you missing the point because the message was about some bloggers and article writers whose purpose was always to write something especially negative news that will make them get traffic.

Hmm. Oh my Gosh. It's true.There's a lot of article writers that are doing so much damage to the market than helping the market because they are never enthusiast of the cryptocurrency and blockchain technology.

Meanwhile, we can not exclude these people from the market despite the damage they are doing to the market because they also help the cryptocurrency market get the needed awareness although it is in a bad way but the true potential of crypto will make people see the positive side of it.