Official forum for Utopia Community
You are not logged in.
full;8358 wrote:Lanistergame2;8321 wrote:This is a beautiful and useful piece of work. How did you come up with this concept? That's very thoughtful of you mate. The function of this bot is one of the lacking most needed features.
There are a lot of people working hard for the greater good of this UtopiaP2P project and if I do the calculation very well the original poster of this topic has created 3 bots.
That's nice of him though because only a few people can be this dedicated to the project and it will be nice if we have a few more people like him on the Utopia
Very soon we should have more enthusiasts that will always be dedicated to the greatness of this project through the ongoing airdrop casue it will make new user learn about the whole UtopiaP2P ecosystem.
full;5058 wrote:joanna;4722 wrote:The Utopia p2p poker game review contest was not hosted on the Utopia application client that's why the announcement was not made on the telegram and application client. However, some users have posted the contest link. Just check the utopia poker room now.
Sort of, the contest that game is hosted on the Utopia application client game while the review announcement was out of the Utopia ecosystem just to trigger cryptocurrency gamblers.
Yes, I think it is because the Utopia poker game is something that has to do with gambling and the best thing to do is offer the contest or review in the venue where people that are enthusiasts of the game will be found.
If that's the contest behind the poker game hosted on Bitcointalk then it's a good one since the forum is categorized as the biggest ecosystem for crypto gamblers.
full;8212 wrote:IyaJJJ;8211 wrote:But if we look deep into this we could say the request of the Chinese user may be what trigger the creation of the Utopia web proxy browser because the browser was created after the topic.
Footing have you a point I wonder why some people still consider that the UtopiaP2P developer still has some sort of community engagement when they are already doing the engagement in their own way.
Someone already suggests that there should be a form of communication and request between the community users and the developer to share knowledge about features that would move the Utopia project forward.
I believe the UtopiaP2P project development team has already created a platform for this. Mind you, the project is a product of 3-4 years of research. Having said that, the community can have some suggestions or discussions with the developer on support.u.is
level;8225 wrote:joanna;8218 wrote:I guess this is the reason why he always uses the slogan keep building but to my knowledge the Utopia ecosystem developers are doing the same thing and that's why we see different updates on their app client.
Yes, the UtopiaP2P ecosystem developers practice also the same habit but they will have their own concept they believe the ecosystem will need and so is the users of the ecosystem.
Where do you see the Utopia p2p ecosystem being in the next 10 years like what are the milestones you this this ecosystem can actually achieve.
It's hard to tell where the UtopiaP2P ecosystem will be in the next 10 years but if the UtopiaP2P team continues to develop and integrate great features on the application client. I believe UtopiaP2P will be among the biggest privacy project.
IyaJJJ;8216 wrote:full;8215 wrote:You have a point though cause seeking for more will punish the developer to create something unique that would lead to more traffic to the UtopiaP2P ecosystem.
The logic to stay ahead of others in every setting is to always continue building and that's what CZ Binance practices, he never feels satisfied after the creation of an innovative concept on Binance he seeks for more.
I guess this is the reason why he always uses the slogan keep building but to my knowledge the Utopia ecosystem developers are doing the same thing and that's why we see different updates on their app client.
Yes, the UtopiaP2P ecosystem developers practice also the same habit but they will have their own concept they believe the ecosystem will need and so is the users of the ecosystem.
joanna;7637 wrote:thrive;7636 wrote:You have a point and the same daily security route is what some enthusiasts did on the Bitcoin network either because the cryptocurrency scammer and hackers always develop new strategies and equipment and it is important for crypto to always develop simultaneously to maintain quality security.
Guys make me understand what you're trying to say since the UtopiaP2P uses Curve25519, XSalsa20, and Poly1305 algorithms to encrypt, sign, and authenticate packets and connections between users. What is more secure than that?
Additionally, Utopia Network uses a dynamic multi-link routing engine with MITM (man-in-the-middle) attack protection, so all user communication is shielded from being intercepted and read by outside parties.
Yes, the UtopiaP2P network is designed with security and privacy as its top priorities. However, the ecosystem still needs validators who act as intermediaries in transmitting data from one user to another, ensuring that all communication is encrypted using advanced algorithms. I believe this is what the users are trying to point out.
joanna;7642 wrote:IyaJJJ;7641 wrote:The cryptocurrency market is not for those who find it difficult to learn from past mistakes because the market can become volatile at times, and only those investors who are able to do so will profit from their subsequent investments. This may seem harsh to some.
Your statement may seem harsh to some people but you're totally telling the truth because only the cryptocurrency investors and traders that learn fast from the previous mistake always make a profit while those that didn't learn will keep making losses.
Hmm, this explains the reason why some cryptocurrency traders quit at some point while some investors complained about making losses. I guess this is the reason why people are advised not to introduce cryptocurrency to kids.
I believe this is the reason but there are some kids who are into cryptocurrency although they are mostly guided by their parents or older siblings and it is all because decision-making in the cryptocurrency market requires maturity making self-responsible for end result.
IyaJJJ;7645 wrote:full;7643 wrote:However, we can conclude everything without hearing from the original poster of this topic who I believe is also the creator of the bot and he appears to have been away for a long time. Is there a way to contact him on the UtopiaP2P application client?
The best way I believe you can contact the user is through the UtopiaP2P application is by adding him to the contact through the public key he posted on this particular thread.
Yes, you're right about adding the public key of the developer but I won't suggest the use of the public key provided by him on this topic because it was meant for the bot and I suggest the use of the public he has on his profile for donation.
The public keys attached to his profile page will be the best indeed but I think it will be better if join the developer channel as suggested by another user and also make use of the public keys because if the user doesn't accept the adding to contact list through public key there's no way to communicate with him.
oba;7719 wrote:full;7649 wrote:If there's a team working on securing it is not enough if they are not updating the system hand-in-hand so that the system will always be ahead of hackers that may be targeting the ecosystem.
After the news of several attacks that were successfully launched on LastPass last year, I don't think it is smart to totally trust any password manager this day to prevent another data breach.
Meanwhile, LastPass was not the only password manager that has been hacked, and for the record Dashlane, Keeper, 1Password, and RoboForm have been hacked either.
It's hard to know how secure these password managers are since it is hard and it will also be dangerous to trust there service safety. Having said that the best secure way to safe passwords will always be the old-fashion way which is offline.
Vastextension;7716 wrote:joanna;7671 wrote:Actually, we cant blame the Centralized exchange for requesting KYC from their users because they are just following the rules and regulations provided to them by the SEC.
Meanwhile, I believe the major cause of the KYC/AML we see in the cryptocurrency today are the crypto scammer and hackers that are abusing the decentralized cryptocurrency potential which makes the SEC intervene in the crypto market by introducing KYC/AML rules.
Apart from the KYC aspect which you guys mentioned to be the drawback of Centralized exchange, there are more drawbacks that I dislike about Centralized exchange is the higher fees. An example Binance's high withdrawal fee years ago before they make an amendment after enriching their pocket through a high withdrawal fee.
Yes, centralized exchanges do charge ridiculous fees for their services compared to decentralized exchanges which can make trading more expensive for users. Another reason is the susceptibility to censorship and control by governments and other regulatory bodies. This is the reason why I will always choose Crypton Exchange as the best exchange for me to trade CRP coins.
Vastextension;7711 wrote:IyaJJJ;7628 wrote:Sort of but it was not created for the Chinese alone. It was actually created for every user of the Utopia ecosystem that needs the Web proxy to escape restriction without the need of paying or buying a VPN.
However, this was a result of the UtopiaP2P developers paying attention to the people's needs and providing speedy solutions to the issue for the betterment of the project.
Yes, since the real intention of the Utopia web proxy tool is to allow users to access websites blocked by their Internet Service Provider (ISP) or government authorities just like we see happening in China.
What I like about using the Utopia web proxy is that people can effortlessly bypass censorship and access websites that would otherwise be restricted.
thrive;7617 wrote:Vastextension;7564 wrote:Yes, things like that make more people to read about cryptocurrency but it's also the reason why project like UtopiaP2P is created although it is a bad thing. Nevertheless, it give rooms for innovative, privacy and security project like Utopia
You have a point. If some cryptocurrency investors are not a victim of crypto scammers people won't look for a solution through a privacy provision project. Yes, it's somehow bad for the market but good for the UtopiaP2P ecosystem.
Normally all cryptocurrency investors ought to adopt the use of privacy and security service to keep their investments secure from prying eyes and online scammers but investor's ignorance to this is the reason why we see people who are victims of crypto hacks.
A naive person is dangerous to themselves and the people around and they mostly dug their own grave not knowing whereas their belief is that they are doing the right thing. It is good for every cryptocurrency investment to know the "doS" and "dontS" in the crypto market.
Dozie;7522 wrote:JONSNOWING;7511 wrote:Guys if you have an issue not a technical issue though so don't tell me about the support, something like you have an advice for the team how can you share it with them.
Well one of the best ways to do that should have been here, that's why I keep asking when would the team be more active on this forum?
When would the team be more active on this forum? Who tells you they are not active on this forum? Do you think they are not working behind the scheme?
I think he doesn't understand all the questions you're asking and his belief is that the UtopiaP2P team is only active on this forum when they post a message or make a direct contribution.
Dozie;7615 wrote:Kelechi;7601 wrote:Well I am a big fan of Manchester united so definitely I would want them to win but I know it's never going to be easy.
Brighton rested a big part of their squad in their last match and where still able to beat wolves 6:0 I don't think Manchester united can win them.
According to the history of the game Manchester United have played against Brighton. They always manage to defeat them and Brighton has defeated Manchester United twice if Man U can still manage in their today's game they may beat Brighton.
Anything can happen in the game of Football and as you can even the Manchester United big fan is not have much confidence that they are going to win the game easily which I believe means Brighton is a dangerous Football club.
full;7687 wrote:joanna;7683 wrote:Privacy consider is one of the reasons why I never use Apple phones as my hot phone. Yes, the features and the functionality of the phone are good and it's indeed top-notch the privacy level of it is a no for me.
One man's food is another poison they say. What you see as your own drawback is the reason why some people choose the Apple phones over any other phones in the market and there's no phone that can compete with Apple phones in the market as we speak.
You have a point because 95% of the people that uses Apple phones use them because of the level of security it provided and the unique feature it had which other mobile phone now imitate.
Despite how the iPhone is a widely popular device with numerous features and advantages, there are some drawbacks to consider as well. It's there battery life for me. iPhone batteries tend to have a shorter lifespan than some other smartphone brands, requiring more frequent charging.
level;7501 wrote:joanna;7500 wrote:If Manchester City is going to win predicted the match to be 2:1 or 2:0 based on the current activity of the Manchester City team and how they are well determined.
I expect history to repeat itself because whenever both sides meet in the Premier League game either Manchester City defeats West Ham or the game ended in a draw.
Your prediction about the game was correct and if you bet on the game I believe it will be an easy win for you and I can see that you're not the only that predicted the game to be either win for Manchester City.
Yes, my prediction about the game comes to pass but that doesn't mean I am that good in football game prediction because what I actually did the research on their previous game together and the current performance.
joanna;7562 wrote:oba;7457 wrote:There's no doubt about the UtopiaP2P ecosystem being indispensable but there's always competition in the cryptocurrency market and for the UtopiaP2P to continue as an indispensable project the dev team needs to do some upgrades from time to time.
You're about what said and one of the things I like about the UtopiaP2P developers is that they are working round the clock and always do some system upgrades so the area you mentioned is settled.
System upgrade is not enough though because they still need to add the latest trending features and I could remember that a lot of users old and new are thrilled when the Utopia developers integrated ChatGPT.
Hmm because the ChatGPT added to the UtopiaP2P application client creates some traffic for the app based on the number of users that I see in the Chat Lobby channel.
KingCRP;7355 wrote:Dozie;7289 wrote:Yes I think you have a point and I respect that but in all you still have to explain to everyone the benefits and the non benefits of using any of the version of the application.
It’s very obvious mate, the mobile application only contains the channels available on the application but the desktop version of the application contains many more utilities that are very important.
Out of curiosity. When was the last time you use the UtopiaP2P mobile application client? Because the last time I checked the Utopia mobile application had ChatGPT AI assistant features despite the mobile being in the beta stage.
I think the reason why he makes this statement will be that he's using the mobile version that's lower to Utopia v.1.2.102 which is currently the latest version of the mobile application
full;7550 wrote:oba;7489 wrote:We are in 21 century and I don't think it should be hard for anyone to know or differentiate the difference between open-source and close source projects if they are not the lazy type that only rely on people's comments.
Meanwhile relying on people's comments is one of the important things a cryptocurrency enthusiast must ignore that's if the person wants to go far in this crypto market and also make a profit either.
DYOR is the best policy in the cryptocurrency market it doesn't only save investors but also let them make the right decision. About the trust wallet, they only feed people with lies whereas the wallet is not open source.
People don't actually make use of Google to know if a project is open source because, with the help of the Utopia ChatGPT, we easily know that since the result of AI, chatbots are always accurate.
Lanistergame2;7223 wrote:thrive;7202 wrote:Technically those that invested in Dogecoin when Elon Musk hype it through Twitter are at loss. There's no one to blame but their naivety about cryptocurrency investment.
Not everyone. There would always be those who were quick enough to make a purchase in anticipation of the spike in the peice after the news announcement and sold off as the price was rising.
For there to be people that made a loss while investing there has to be those that dumped on them who made a profit
Yeah, some folks have the mentality of selling off immediately there is hype or an increase in the price of a commodity. This can be a good thing to some extent but can also be bad. I usually tell people if you withdraw your Bitcoin when it was 50 or 100 dollars you still made a profit and should not be mad at yourself for not leaving it to get to 50k dollars.
Yes, people that bought Bitcoin when it was 50 dollars make a profit selling it at 100 dollars. Why would they be mad about their decision when it was self made decision and the only person to be judge is themselves because better is make in crypto when invest for the long-term.
oba;7496 wrote:Detroit;7391 wrote:I will strongly disagree with that statement. Possibly you're judging from your geographical location. Here in the UK, NFT is one of the top most profitable online businesses currently.
Ok but I am not judging based on geographical location and I was judging based on the NFT global market. We all know how NFTs were the rave of the moment in the cryptocurrency market until a lot of dev jump into it just to make money.
I think you have a point people are not talking much about the NFT market now like before and most NFTs collectors that purchase some NFTs years ago are currently at a loss. Besides, I hear news about someone purchasing BAYC with thousands of dollars and selling it in a hundred last year.
With what I am currently seeing in the NFT market if there's no bullish momentum in the market after the Bitcoin block halving executed forget about the NFT market cause 80% of all the projects there will vanish.
Detroit;7390 wrote:So does utopia also own the domain of your website?
I don't understand what you mean here but the whole concept of hosting a website on the UtopiaP2P network is to create a mirror of your website on the Utopia network to enjoy privacy and other benefit.
In addition what was said. DNS is centralized and censorship. The chance of the Domains can be revoked or suspended is huge and by mirroring the website on the Utopia network there's no problem.
joanna;7518 wrote:full;7517 wrote:I'm surprised some people still dont understand that the total privacy provision of the UtopiaP2P ecosystem is provided through their application client and for the Web proxy to provide adequate privacy it has to be on the app client.
Yes, and the web proxy is built into the Idyll browser, which is also included in the Utopia software package. It operates by encrypting and routing the user's internet data through Utopia's peer-to-peer network, making it harder for anyone to monitor or track the user's behavior.
What I like about the web proxy is that users can access any website they want for free through it, and their browsing activity will remain completely private and secure.
Apart from the recent ChatGPT that's integrated into the UtopiaP2P app client. I consider the Utopia Web Proxy to be an important tool for anyone who wants to protect their online privacy and maintain their anonymity while using the internet.
Detroit;7470 wrote:full;7434 wrote:I think you just misinterpreted what the user is saying because he was talking about Crypton Exchange and user Binance with the addition of the creation of business as an example.
What I can say is that the Utopia team knows what is best for the project.Sorry, I missed that. But as you said, the project developers know what's best for business for them. The Utopia community project is already doing well, I hope they don't ruin it.
I know you care about the fruitfulness of the project and so far the UtopiaP2P developer has been making the right decision for the past 4years if I'm not mistaken and I think that's nice for us to trust their instinct.
I will make my contribution to this conversation base on how the Utopia developer team has handled the Crypton Exchange from day one and how it is still functioning now. if they could that I think their decision and move won't hurt the project.
oba;7499 wrote:KingCRP;7466 wrote:Today Manchester City goes out again in the English Premier League I don’t think it would be an easy game for them but with the title now in there hands they won’t want to loose it.
Manchester City today's Premier League against the West Ham United may not be easy ask you said but I only expect two things to happen in the game which is either Manchester City or the match end with a draw.
If Manchester City is going to win predicted the match to be 2:1 or 2:0 based on the current activity of the Manchester City team and how they are well determined.
I expect history to repeat itself because whenever both sides meet in the Premier League game either Manchester City defeats West Ham or the game ended in a draw.